Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki


From Virtual Education Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
POERUP (Policies for OER Uptake) Project Logo

The public POERUP deliverables including Final Reports are now in various locations including on this wiki at POERUP list of deliverables.

POERUP (Policies for OER Uptake) was a project approved by the Lifelong Learning Programme under Key Activity 3 ICT. The project Consortium was a group of organisations across Europe and Canada interested in understanding how better to foster the uptake of OER by governments (national and regional) and groups of educational institutions. The coverage is all sectors of education but with a core focus on higher education and schools.

The consortium consisted of:

  1. Two open universities (Open Universiteit Nederland and Athabasca University)
  2. Two campus universities, but both with capacity in distance education (University of Leicester - the Applicant - and Videoscop - the Evaluator)
  3. Two specialist e-learning consultancies: Sero - the Coordinator - and SCIENTER - who had to withdraw in 2013
  4. One Europe-wide e-learning association (EDEN)

The Project Manager was Professor Paul Bacsich.

The project funding period ran from 1 November 2011 until 30 June 2014 - with final reports completed on 31 October 2014.


The project used a multi-method research approach to triangulate research data from different sources to gain an in-depth view into the topic. The research was organised into three implementation WPs - 2, 3 and 4 - as follows:

  1. (WP 2) Produce a global inventory of at least 100 of the most relevant national and other large-scale OER initiatives at the above institution level. This is done by in-depth desk research. This is coordinated by University of Leicester, using methodologies developed by Sero for VISCED, but input from all partners makes sure that language barriers are overcome and needed links used in an optimal way.
  2. (WP 2) Produce 11 country reports plus 13 more country mini-reports (8 European, 5 non-European). These are created based on literature review and document analysis of relevant policy papers and country reports from previous projects. If needed, telephone interviews are set up with relevant policy-makers. Every partner produces country reports.
  3. (WP 2) Foster volunteer effort via IAC to produce more country mini-reports.
  4. (WP 3) From the inventory in the context of the country studies, select 7 case studies (2 primary school, 2 secondary school, 2 university, 1 "other"). To gain an in-depth view into the dynamics of OER communities we use Social Network Analysis methodology (see e.g. http://www.open.ou.nl/rslmlt/). This is a well-known methodology based on sociometrics to get an in-depth view into network structures. Five partners gather all needed case study data but OUNL centrally analyses all data with the necessary SNA tools. Based on the analysis, OUNL writes the recommendations, with contributions from all case study partners.
  5. (WP 4) Distil lessons from these, the inventory and the country studies to produce 3 EU-wide policy papers: for schools, for universities, and for colleges and other organised education providers. This is coordinated by WP 4 leader SCIENTER, but, especially for this analysis, in-depth discussions are organised with the IAC. This results in a set of policies and guidelines. These results are combined with the recommendations from WP 3 and collected in an on-line handbook.
  6. (WP 4) Finally press down these reports to the national level with 7 options brief packs for EU nations/regions: UK (England, Wales and Scotland separately), Netherlands, Italy, Hungary, and France - each in the national language with an Executive Summary in the national language and in English.

Both the process and the outputs were evaluated by WP 7 Evaluation.

WP 1 Management made sure all deliverables were produced on time and within the limitations of the budget. WP 1 Management also made sure that partners meet on a regular basis so that all WP work was centrally coordinated and closely linked. This spine was strongly embedded in a body of Dissemination (WP 5) and Exploitation (WP 6) via the IAC and direct ministry links.

> Main Page