Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki

Bibliography of Learner Use of non-OER Online Resources

From Virtual Education Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bibliography of Learner Use of non-OER online resources, prepared 31 May 2011

by Paul Bacsich, Barry Phillips and Sara Frank Bristow

This is the bibliography version of the Mendeley Group Learner Use of non-OER online resources – http://www.mendeley.com/groups/1098021/learner-use-of-non-oer-online-resources/. It was created by a Select All in the Mendeley desktop client, then Copy, then Paste into Word. The format is Harvard Author (Date).

  1. Abbas, J., 2005. Out of the mouths of middle school children: I. Developing user-defined controlled vocabularies for subject access in a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(14), pp.1512-1524 ST - Out of the mouths of middle school. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.20245/abstract?
  2. Allen, N., 2009. Course Correction: Executive Summary. EDUCAUSE Review, 44(1), pp.19-20 ST - Course Correction: Executive Summary. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/ExecutiveSummary/163571.
  3. Amir Azer, M. & El-Sherbini, A.M., 2011. Cultural Challenges in Developing E-Learning Content. International Journal of Emerging …, 6(1). Available at: http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/viewArticle/1467 [Accessed May 4, 2011].
  4. Anderson, T, 2003. Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In Handbook of Dstance Education. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=terry++Open+Educational+Resources+author:Anderson&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0,49&as_ylo=&as_vis=0#3 [Accessed May 5, 2011].
  5. Anderson, T, 2004. Teaching in an online learning context. In Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press, p. 343-. Available at: http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120146 [Accessed May 5, 2011].
  6. Anderson, T, 2008. Towards a theory of online learning. In Theory and practice of online learning,. Available at: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RifNwzU3HR4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA45&dq=terry++Open+Educational+Resources+Anderson&ots=Se5mMgLWot&sig=0XivOj2Mr6axwldioLCy4gefzaA [Accessed May 5, 2011].
  7. Anderson, Terry, 2007. Educational Social Software: Social Learning 2.0. Conference Presentation. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/terrya/educational-social-software-edmedia-2007 [Accessed May 7, 2011].
  8. Anon, 2000. The Application and Implications of Information Technologies in Postsecondary Distance Education: An Initial Bibliography, Arlington. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf03305/sectb.htm [Accessed May 7, 2011].
  9. anon (JISC), 2011. Response from JISC to the Independent Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, Available at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-thejoint.pdf.
  10. Appleton, L., 2006. Perceptions of electronic library resources in further education. The Electronic Library, 24(5), pp.619-634. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02640470610707231 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  11. Bass, K.M., Puckett, C. & Rockman, S., 2008. Models of Digital Collection Use in a University Community. Educational Technology, 48(1), pp.44-49. Available at: http://www.rockman.com/publications/articles/ModelsDigitalCollection.pdf.
  12. Beaudoin, M.F., Kurtz, G. & Eden, S., 2009. Experiences and Opinions of E-learners: What Works, What are the Challenges, and What Competencies Ensure Successful Online Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 5, pp.275-289 ST - Experiences and Opinions of E-learner. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=48317320&site=ehost-live.
  13. Bell, S.J., 2004. The Infodiet: How Libraries Can Offer an Appetizing Alternative to Google. Chronicle of Higher Education, (24). Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/The-Infodiet-How-Libraries/4458 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  14. Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L., 2008. The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), pp.775-786. Available at: http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.
  15. Bishop, A.P., 1998. Logins and bailouts: measuring access, use, and success in digital libraries. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2). Available at: http://www.press.umich.edu.www.libproxy.wvu.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html.
  16. Borg, M. & Stretton, E., 2009. My students and other animals. Or, a vulture, an orb weaver spider, a giant panda and 900 undergraduate business students…. Journal of information literacy, 3(1), pp.1-30. Available at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/1012/.
  17. Brumfield, E.J., 2008. Using Online Tutorials to Reduce Uncertainty in Information Seeking Behavior. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3/4), pp.365-377 ST - Using Online Tutorials to Reduce Unce. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a903672583~db=all~jumptype=rss.
  18. Bury, L., 2009. The e-textbook gulf. The Bookseller, Volume|(5408), p.22. Available at: http://www.thebookseller.com/feature/digital-focus-e-textbook-gulf.html.
  19. Butler, D., 2009. The textbook of the future. Nature News, 458(7238), p.568 ST - The textbook of the future: undergraduat. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090401/full/458568a.html.
  20. Carlson, S., 2005. Online Textbooks Fail to Make the Grade. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(23), p.A.35 ST - Online Textbooks Fail to Make the Grade. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Online-Textbooks-Fail-to-Make/18496.
  21. Chen, S.-H., 1993. A study of high school studentsʼ online catalog searching behavior. School Library Media Quarterly, 22(1), p.33 ST - A study of high school studentsʼ online c. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=9403111707&site=ehost-live.
  22. Chih-Ming, C. & Chia-Chi, C., 2010. Problem-based learning supported by digital archives. The Electronic Library, 28(1), pp.5-28 ST - Problem-based learning supported by dig.
  23. Childs, S. et al., 2005. Effective e-learning for health professionals and students--barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature--findings from the HeXL project. Health information and libraries journal, 22 Suppl 2, pp.20-32. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16279973.
  24. Ciampa, K., 2010. The impact of a digital childrenʼs literature program on primary students' reading motivation. Brock University. Available at: http://dr.library.brocku.ca/handle/10464/3057.
  25. Connaway, L.S., Olszewski, L. & Jenkins, L.R., with Chandra, 2006. What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), pp.74-89. Available at: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/newsletters/prabha-satisficing.pdf [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  26. Connaway, L.S. et al., 2008. Sense-Making and Synchronicity : Information-Seeking and Communication Behaviors of Millennials and Baby Boomers. Libri, 58(2), pp.123-135. Available at: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2008/connaway-libri.pdf.
  27. Costa, C., 2009. Use of Online Information Resources by RMIT University Economics, Finance, and Marketing Students Participating in a Cooperative Education Program. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(1), pp.36-49 ST - USE OF ONLINE INFORMATION RESOURCES BY. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ860837&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ860837.
  28. David Glenn, 2011. Presidents Are Divided on Best Ways to Measure Quality. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Presidents-Dont-Agree-on-What/127528/?sid=wb&utm_source=wb&utm_medium=en [Accessed May 16, 2011].
  29. Dee, C. & Stanley, E.E., 2005. Information-seeking behavior of nursing students and clinical nurses: implications for health sciences librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), pp.213-222 ST - Information-seeking behavior of nursi. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1082938/.
  30. DeRosa, C. et al., 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: a Report to the OCLC Membership, OCLC. Available at: http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm.
  31. Diamond, W. & Pease, B., 2001. Digital reference: a case study of question types in an academic library. Reference Services Review, 29(3), pp.210-219 ST - Digital reference: a case study of q.
  32. Druin, A., 2005. What Children Can Teach Us: Developing Digital Libraries for Children with Children. The Library Quarterly, 75(1), pp.20-41 ST - What Children Can Teach Us: Developing.
  33. Duffy, T.M., Kirkley, J.R. & Erlbaum, L., 2004. Learner Centered Theory And Practice In Distance Education: Cases From Higher Education - Research and Read Books, Journals, Articles at Questia Online Library, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at: http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=104720804 [Accessed May 7, 2011].
  34. Escoffery, C. et al., 2005. Internet Use for Health Information Among College Students. Journal of American College Health, 53(4), pp.183-188 ST - Internet Use for Health Information A. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15663067.
  35. Gilbert, J., Morton, S. & Rowley, J., 2007. e-Learning: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), pp.560-573. Available at: http://www.mendeley.com/research/elearning-the-student-experience/ [Accessed June 26, 2010].
  36. Ginns, P. & Ellis, R., 2007. Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), pp.53-64. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1096751606000728.
  37. Grays, L., Bosque, D.D. & Costello, K., 2008. Building a Better M.I.C.E. Trap: Using Virtual Focus Groups to Assess Subject Guides for Distance Education Students. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3), pp.431-453. Available at: http://digitalcommons.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=lib_articles&sei-redir=1#search=“Building+a+Better+M.LC.E.+Trap:Using+Virtual+Focus+Groups+to+Assess” [Accessed May 30, 2011].
  38. Griffiths, J.R. & Brophy, P., 2005. Student Searching Behavior and the Web : Use of Academic Resources and Google Survey of Existing Search Engine Use Research. Library Trends, 53(4), pp.539-554. Available at: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/6952998/student-searching-behavior-and-the-web-use-of-academic-resources-and-google.
  39. Grimes, D.J. & Boening, C.H., 2001. Worries with the Web : A Look at Student Use of Web Resources. College & Research Libraries, 62, pp.11-22.
  40. Grudzien, P. & Casey, A.M., 2008. Do Off-Campus Students Use E-Books? Journal of Library Administration, 48(3), pp.455-466. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/01930820802289532&magic=crossref%7C%7CD404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  41. Hargreaves, I., 2011. Digital Opportunity Trust: Bringing People and Technology Together for Development. IndpeReview of Intellectual Property and Growth, 23(2-3), p.130. Available at: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf.
  42. Harley, D. & Henke, J., 2007. Toward an Effective Understanding of Website Users. D-Lib Magazine, p.Volume 13 Number 3/4. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/harley/03harley.html [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  43. Harley, D. et al., 2006. Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Science, Berkeley. Available at: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/digitalresourcestudy/report/.
  44. Harvel, L.D., 2005. Using student-generated notes as an interface to a digital repository. Available at: http://etd.gatech.edu/theses/available/etd-11272005-214035/unrestricted/harvel_lonnie_d_200512_phd.pdf.
  45. Hawk, J. & Sturtz, C., with Peggy Gallagher, 2011. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community, OCLC. Available at: http://www.oclc.org/reports/2010perceptions/2010perceptions_all_singlepage.pdf.
  46. Head, A J, 2007. Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday, 12(8), p.0. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1998/1873.
  47. Head, Alison J, 2008. Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social Science Majors Conduct Academic Research? College Research Libraries, 69(5), pp.427-446. Available at: http://library2.stmarys-ca.edu/features/SMCInfoLit.pdf.
  48. Heath, F., 2007. The Impact of Evolving Information-Seeking Behaviors Upon Research Libraries: A Case Study. Journal of Library Administration, 46(2), pp.3-16 ST - The Impact of Evolving Information-Seeki.
  49. Hembrooke, H. et al., 2006. One digital library, two undergraduate classes, and four learning modules: Uses of a digital library in classrooms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), pp.1315-1325 ST - One digital library, two undergrad.
  50. Hill, J.R. & Hannafin, M.J., 2001. Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), pp.37-52 ST - Teaching and learning in digital envir.
  51. Hill, R., 2010. Turning the page: forget about those bulky backbreakers, digital textbooks are the future. School Library Journal, 56(10), p.24 ST - Turning the page: forget about those bulk.
  52. Hsinchun, C., 2004. Digital library research in the US: an overview with a knowledge management perspective. Program: electronic library and information systems, 38(3), pp.157-167 ST - Digital library research in the US: .
  53. Jamali, H.R. & Nicholas, David, 2008. Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), pp.444-462 ST - Information-seeking behaviour of phys. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/13096.
  54. Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, David & Rowlands, I., 2010. E-textbook use, information seeking behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), pp.263-280 ST - E-textbook use, information seeking. Available at: http://jis.sagepub.com/content/36/2/263.abstract.
  55. Jeffrey, R.Y., 2009. The Year of E-Textbooks?: Many titles are available, but students are wary. The Chronicle of Higher Education, (Journal Article).
  56. Katie, A., 2011. Opening Digital Books. Education Weekʼs Digital Directions, 4(2), p.42 ST - Opening Digital Books.
  57. Kaur, B. & Verma, R., 2009. Use and impact of electronic journals in the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India. The Electronic Library, 27(4), pp.611-622. Available at: http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=47B09C5B61FFF19C7E27.
  58. Keeble, K., 2008. Digital gaming as a pedagogical tool among fourth and fifth grade children. Walden University. Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/33/04/3304040.html.
  59. Keller, M. et al., 2002. E-Journal User Study: Report of Web Log Data Mining, Stanford. Available at: http://ejust.stanford.edu/logdata.html.
  60. Kelley, K.B. & Orr, G.J., 2003. Trends in Distant Student Use of Electronic Resources : A Survey. College & Research Libraries, (May), pp.176-191. Available at: http://crl.acrl.org/content/64/3/176.full.pdf.
  61. Kim, Y.-M., 2010. The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5), pp.978-993. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1814508.1814526 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  62. Kinman, V., 2009. E-Metrics and Library Assessment in Action. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 21(1), pp.15-36. Available at: http://www.longwood.edu/staff/kinmanvr/kinman_emetrics_embedded_figures_single.pdf [Accessed April 28, 2011].
  63. Kolowich, S., 2011. All In the Delivery. Inside Higher Ed, p.5. Available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/08/31/ebooks [Accessed May 19, 2011].
  64. Kvavik, R.B. & Caruso, J.B., 2005. ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning, Available at: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0506/rs/ers0506w.pdf.
  65. Lee, S.W.-Y. & Tsai, C.-C., 2011. Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), pp.905-914 ST - Students’ perceptions of collaboratio. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1937631.
  66. Liu, Z., 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), pp.700-712. Available at: http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/post/research-project/research-clearinghouse-individual/objects-for-study-individual/all-objects-for-study/ziming-liu-reading-behavior-in-the-digital-environment-changes-in-reading-behavior-over-the-past-ten-years-2005 [Accessed May 30, 2011].
  67. Manduca, C. et al., 2008. The use of online digital resources and educational digital libraries in higher education. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 9(1), pp.65-79 ST - The use of online digital resources an.
  68. Matusiak, K., 2006. Information Seeking Behavior in Digital Image Collections: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), pp.479-488. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133306000942.
  69. Mcclure, R. & Clink, K., 2008. How Do You Know That?: An Investigation of Student Research Practices in the Digital Age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), pp.115-132. Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v009/9.1.mcclure.html [Accessed May 6, 2011].
  70. Mcgreal, R., 2009. Time to change rules on textbooks. Calgary Herald, p.A.13 ST - Time to change rules on textbooks.
  71. Medeiros, N., 2009. Researching the research process: Information-seeking behavior, Summon, and Google Books. OCLC Systems & Services, 25(3), pp.153-155 ST - Researching the research process: Inf. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1810661&show=html.
  72. Melucci, M., 2004. Making digital libraries effective: Automatic generation of links for similarity search across hyper-textbooks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(5), pp.414-430 ST - Making digital libraries effective:
  73. Metzger, M.J. & Flanagin, A.J., 2008. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, MIT Press. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/dmal/-/2.
  74. Michaelsen, V.E. et al., 1995. A Comparison of Educational Interventions: Multimedia Textbook, Standard Lecture, and Printed Textbook. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 149(3), pp.297-302 ST - A Comparison of Educational Interven.
  75. Minguillón, J. et al., 2007. Enriching e-learning metadata through digital library usage analysis. The Electronic Library, 25(2), pp.148-165 ST - Enriching e-learning metadata throug.
  76. Mizrachi, D., 2010. Undergraduatesʼ academic information and library behaviors: preliminary results. Reference Services Review, 38(4), pp.571-580. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00907321011090737 [Accessed February 6, 2011].
  77. Nachmias, R., 2003. Studentsʼ use of content in Web-supported academic courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), pp.145-157. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1096751603000216 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  78. Nicholas, D, Huntington, P & Watkinson, A, 2005. Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), pp.248-280. Available at: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/12326/.
  79. Nicholas, David, Huntington, Paul & Jamali, H.R., 2007. Diversity in the Information Seeking Behaviour of the Virtual Scholar: Institutional Comparisons. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), pp.629-638 ST - Diversity in the Information Seeking. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.001.
  80. Nicholas, David et al., 2009. Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context. Journal of Documentation, 65(1), pp.106-132 ST - Student digital information-seeking b. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1766885&show=pdf.
  81. Nicholas, David et al., 2006. Engaging with scholarly digital libraries (publisher platforms): The extent to which “added-value” functions are used. Information Processing & Management, 42(3), pp.826-842. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1131990.1710774 [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  82. Nicholas, David et al., 2008. UK scholarly e-book usage: a landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), pp.311-334 ST - UK scholarly e-book usage: a landmark. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1733496&show=html.
  83. Nicholas, David et al., 2008. The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), pp.290-310 ST - The Google generation: the informatio. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0001-253X&volume=60&issue=4&articleid=1733495&show=pdf.
  84. Overland, M.A., 2011. State of Washington to Offer Online Materials, Instead of Textbooks, for 2-Year Colleges; Money-saving effort at 2-year colleges faces vexing problems. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(19).
  85. Overland, M.A., 2011. Textbooks? So Last Century. Rent a Netbook Instead. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(19).
  86. Paul, H. et al., 2003. Digital information consumers, players and purchasers: information seeking behaviour in the new digital interactive environment. Aslib Proceedings, 55(1/2), pp.23-31 ST - Digital information consumers, players.
  87. Percheski, C. & Hargittai, E., 2011. Health Information-Seeking in the Digital Age. Journal of American College Health, 59(5), pp.379-386 ST - Health Information-Seeking in the Dig. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21500056.
  88. Pete, W., David, N. & Barrie, G., 2005. Elearning what the literature tells us about distance education. Perspectives, 57, pp.109-122. Available at: http://resolver.scholarsportal.info/resolve/0001253x/v57i0002/109_ewtltuade&form=pdf&file=file.pdf.
  89. Po, J. & Evans, E., 2006. A break in the transaction: Examining studentsʼ responses to digital texts. Computers and Composition, 24(1), pp.56-73 ST - A break in the transaction: Examining .
  90. Ramaswami, R., 2010. A custom fit: the movement toward open educational resources turns teachers into the shapers of curriculum, mixing and matching educational materials to create content that is tailor-made for the needs of their students. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 37(3), p.20 ST - A custom fit: the movement toward open ed.
  91. Randall, S., 2009. Texting? No, Just Trying to Read Chapter 6: Money and Business/Financial Desk. New York Times, p.BU.3 ST - Texting? No, Just Trying to Read Chapte.
  92. Rohleder, P. et al., 2007. Students’ evaluations of the use of e-learning in a collaborative project between two South African universities. Higher Education, 56(1), pp.95-107. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10734-007-9091-3.
  93. Rowlands, I. & Nicholas, David, 2008. Understanding Information Behaviour: How Do Students and Faculty Find Books? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), pp.3-15 ST - Understanding Information Behaviour: How. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ786041&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ786041.
  94. Rowlands, I. et al., 2007. What do faculty and students really think about e-books? Aslib Proceedings, 59(6), pp.489-511 ST - What do faculty and students really t. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1640587&show=abstract.
  95. Rowley, J. & Urquhart, C., 2007. Understanding Student Information Behavior in Relation to Electronic Information Services : Lessons From Longitudinal Monitoring and Evaluation , Part 1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(April), pp.1162-1174.
  96. Saeed Rezaei, S., 2006. How digital libraries can support e-learning. The Electronic Library, 24(3), pp.389-401 ST - How digital libraries can support e-.
  97. Selwyn, N., 2009. The digital native – myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), pp.364-379. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00012530910973776 [Accessed March 1, 2011].
  98. Serotkin, P., 2005. If we build it, will they come? Electronic journals acceptance and usage patterns. Order A Journal On The Theory Of Ordered Sets And Its Applications, 5(4), pp.497-512.
  99. Sharpe, R & Benfield, G., 2005. The Student Experience of E-learning in Higher Education: a review of the literature. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 1(3), pp.1-7. Available at: http://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/fef9bbad-0f24-7e9b-f629-f90c740b3900/1/.
  100. Sharpe, Rhona, 2005. The Student Experience of E-learning in Higher Education : A Review of the Literature. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 1(3).
  101. Shen, J., 2009. Nurturing Students’ Critical Knowledge Using Technology-enhanced Scaffolding Strategies in Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), pp.1-12. Available at: http://0-www.eric.ed.gov.novacat.nova.edu/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ870114&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ870114 [Accessed May 11, 2011].
  102. Sweat-Guy, R., Elobaid, M. & Buzzetto-More, N., 2007. Reading in a digital age: e-books are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge, and Learning Objects, 3(Journal Article), p.239 ST - Reading in a digital age: e-books are st.
  103. Trivedi, M., 2010. Digital libraries: functionality, usability, and accessibility. Library Philosophy and Practice, (Journal Article).
  104. Troutner, J., 2009. Online textbooks: an opportunity for teacher-librarians.(WEB WONDERS). Teacher Librarian, 37(2), p.60 ST - Online textbooks: an opportunity for teac.
  105. Tsai, M.-J., 2009. Online Information Searching Strategy Inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53(2), pp.473-483 ST - Online Information Searching Strategy. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1552906.
  106. Wallace, R.M. et al., 2000. Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), pp.75-104 ST - Science on the Web: Students Online in. Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a785041227~frm=titlelink.
  107. Warwick, C. et al., 2008. Library and information resources and users of digital resources in the humanities. Program: electronic library and information systems, 42(1), pp.5-27. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00330330810851555 [Accessed January 20, 2011].
  108. Watts, J.K., 2008. Teaching digital media as an art class: A search to define a curriculum. Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/33/41/3341339.html.
  109. Weiler, A., 2005. Information-Seeking Behavior in Generation Y Students: Motivation, Critical Thinking, and Learning Theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship2, 31(1), pp.46-53.
  110. Wendling, D.L. & Johnson, T., 2008. Student research behavior: Quantitative and qualitative research findings presented with visualizations. In 2008 Library Assessment Conference Proceedings: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment. pp. 1-22.
  111. Wieder, B., 2011. Textbooks Go the iTunes Route, but Buying by Chapters Might Not Save Students Money. Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Textbooks-Go-the-iTunes-Route/127590/?sid=wb&utm_source=wb&utm_medium=en [Accessed May 24, 2011].
  112. William, R.J. et al., 2011. Trading Textbooks for Technology: New Opportunities for Learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), pp.46-50 ST - Trading Textbooks for Technology: New. Available at: http://www.kappanmagazine.org/content/92/7/46.abstract.
  113. Willson, R. & Given, L.M., 2010. The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs: A mixed methods study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(12), pp.2461-2476 ST - The effect of spelling and retrieva. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21433/abstract.
  114. Wu, H.-C. et al., 2010. College studentsʼ misunderstandings about copyright laws for digital library resources. The Electronic Library, 28(2), pp.197-209. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0264-0473&volume=28&issue=2&articleid=1853057&show=html [Accessed May 27, 2011].
  115. Yang, S.C., 2001. An interpretive and situated approach to an evaluation of Perseus digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), pp.1210-1223 ST - An interpretive and situated appro.
  116. Zhang, Z. & Kenny, R., 2010. Learning in an online distance education course: Experiences of three international students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), pp.17-36. Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/775/1515 [Accessed May 17, 2011].


> VISCED
> LUOERL
> Bibliographies

>> Main Page

Retrieved from "http://openeducation.wiki/w/index.php?title=Bibliography_of_Learner_Use_of_non-OER_Online_Resources&oldid=23914"