Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki
Key Success Factors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(entry slap-down of table) |
(added brief explanation and link to key success factor) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| border= | '''''This is the table of Key Success Factors created for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.''''' | ||
|+ table of Key Success Factors | |||
A [[key success factor]] is a factor whose presence is necessary for an organisation to fulfil its mission, for some subset of virtual campuses - such as National initiatives. In other words, it is a [[critical success factor]] across that subset. | |||
{| border="1" | |||
|+ table of Key Success Factors with indication of which types of virtual campus they apply to | |||
!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions | !Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 6: | Line 11: | ||
|Collaboration for e-Learning | |Collaboration for e-Learning | ||
|The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems. | |The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems. | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 20: | Line 25: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
|Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues | |Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R34 | |R34 | ||
| | |Recruitment of Staff | ||
|The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning | |The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
|maybe | |align="center"|maybe | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R37 | |R37 | ||
Line 59: | Line 64: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 66: | Line 71: | ||
|Consortia No-Compete | |Consortia No-Compete | ||
|The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved | |The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 76: | Line 81: | ||
|Consortia Roles Definition | |Consortia Roles Definition | ||
|Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners. | |Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners. | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 86: | Line 91: | ||
|Consortia Role Implementation | |Consortia Role Implementation | ||
|Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners. | |Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners. | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 101: | Line 106: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R56 | |R56 | ||
Line 110: | Line 115: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
|maybe | |align="center"|maybe | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R59 | |R59 | ||
Line 120: | Line 125: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
|maybe | |align="center"|maybe | ||
|- | |- | ||
|R82 | |R82 | ||
Line 129: | Line 134: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 140: | Line 145: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |align="center"|X | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
---- | |||
> [[Critical Success Factors]] | |||
<br> | |||
>> [[Main Page]] |
Latest revision as of 13:02, 4 June 2009
This is the table of Key Success Factors created for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.
A key success factor is a factor whose presence is necessary for an organisation to fulfil its mission, for some subset of virtual campuses - such as National initiatives. In other words, it is a critical success factor across that subset.
Code | Factor name | Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement) | Consortia | National initiatives | Newly created institutions | Evolution of existing institutions | For-profits | Public institutions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R24 | Collaboration for e-Learning | The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems. | X | X | ||||
R25 | Brand Management | The institution has a reasoned approach to managing its brand | X | |||||
R32 | Worldware for Students | Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues | X | X | ||||
R34 | Recruitment of Staff | The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning | X | |||||
R36 | Pricing | The institution has effective processes which ensure that the price of its courses are competitive yet sustainable. | X | maybe | ||||
R37 | Innovation Management | The institution has a balanced approach to encouraging innovation and innovators within the constraints of delivering effective services attractive to students. | X | |||||
R41 | Consortia No-Compete | The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved | X | |||||
R42 | Consortia Roles Definition | Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners. | X | |||||
R43 | Consortia Role Implementation | Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners. | X | |||||
R55 | Foresight | Both look-ahead and lab, working in concert; at least one of these should be a sector leader. | X | |||||
R56 | Selling | Widespread skill in selling e-learning and the theory to support the skills. | X | maybe | ||||
R59 | Competitor Research | The institution has processes to carefully analyse the relationship of each proposed e-learning offering to existing providers and stakeholders. | X | maybe | ||||
R82 | Dissemination Internal | A systematic managed process of internal dissemination of good practice in e-learning aspects of courses is in place. | X | |||||
R99 | Organisational Learning | Institution is a learning organisation on all core aspects of e-learning. | X |