Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki

User talk:SaraFrankBristow: Difference between revisions

From Virtual Education Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:
* Should new additions have glaring relevance to Re.ViCa (i.e. distance learning oozing from their pores already) or is it enough that <name> mentions a recent visit to meet with their dean?
* Should new additions have glaring relevance to Re.ViCa (i.e. distance learning oozing from their pores already) or is it enough that <name> mentions a recent visit to meet with their dean?


* ...I am contemplating how to decide whether institutions already
* ...I am contemplating how to decide whether institutions already named in reports like this should be added to the programmes list. For example, it sounds like some of the Japanese universities have very serious e-learning initiatives underway. In fact I often spot examples listed in country reports which do not (yet?) have entries in our programmes list. Would we say that, if it is mentioned anywhere in the wiki, it requires at least a stub?
named in reports like this should be added to the programmes list. For
example, it sounds like some of the Japanese universities have very
serious e-learning initiatives underway. In fact I often spot examples
listed in country reports which do not (yet?) have entries in our
programmes list. Would we say that, if it is mentioned anywhere in the
wiki, it requires at least a stub


* How far from academia do we stray? The Pipeline Project at
* How far from academia do we stray? The Pipeline Project at http://www.pipeline-project.org/ is of interest but I take it that a
http://www.pipeline-project.org/ is of interest but I take it that a
"prisoner education" project is too far out of bounds for our purposes?
"prisoner education" project too far out of bounds for our purposes?

Revision as of 16:38, 13 December 2008


Added Nov 15 2008:

Here is my "Do We Add" list. Some of the items below are not programmes but are lists themselves. Do I pull this institutions from the lists? Etc. Actually, there will be some notes below as well...

Please add four tildes in sequence when saving your changes so I know who wrote what and when - thank you!

DO WE ADD

  • Items Sara emailed Paul about, e.g. those in Japan Report (see new section below)
  • Laureate Education (i.e. Sylvan)
  • Career Education (similar)
  • Fédération Interuniversitaire de l’Enseignement à Distance - FIED (Karran)
  • From InnoUniLearning:
    • Wirtschaft university, vienna
    • Univ. Porto - under Major e-learning initiatives in Portugal
    • University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
    • Institut d’Administration des Entreprises de Caen (Institute of Corporation
    • ENIC Lille
  • Various from Laura Czerniewicz reports (sent to Paul)
  • Items at http://www.eden-online.org/eden.php?menuId=402&contentId=717
  • Per geteducated.com email from Paul: The Top 12 Best Online Management Masters degrees, all available at a cost under $21,000 are offered by: #1 University of Missouri Columbia ($9,854); #2 Mountain State University ($11,700); and #3 University of Missouri Columbia ($11,700).
  • CSU Global (CO) (do we care?)
  • The eLearning industry and market in Europe - Lot 1: Appendix to Synthesis Report by Jane Massy
  • All from Canada country report?
  • Colombia country report - I cannot evaluate, all sites in Spanish
  • Denmark country report - many listed with no real weighting - add all?
  • Germany country report - I cannot evaluate, most sites in German
  • Removed concordia (estonia) - now merged into other institution, info hard to locate.

SaraFrankBristow 21:40, 15 November 2008 (CET)



OTHER LIST OF QUESTIONS EMAILED

  • Do you feel that ALL occurrences of abbreviations should redirect to the full programme names, with the actual content residing under the full name page? (e.g. move the UKeU content to a full name page, with the abbreviation page set as a redirect only?) Also, should we "activate" ALL abbreviation links, i.e. on the programmes list *and* within each programme page? Where they occur in country pages, etc?
  • Should new additions have glaring relevance to Re.ViCa (i.e. distance learning oozing from their pores already) or is it enough that <name> mentions a recent visit to meet with their dean?
  • ...I am contemplating how to decide whether institutions already named in reports like this should be added to the programmes list. For example, it sounds like some of the Japanese universities have very serious e-learning initiatives underway. In fact I often spot examples listed in country reports which do not (yet?) have entries in our programmes list. Would we say that, if it is mentioned anywhere in the wiki, it requires at least a stub?

"prisoner education" project is too far out of bounds for our purposes?