Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki
User talk:SaraFrankBristow: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(add new question list from emails already sent) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
DO WE ADD</b> | DO WE ADD</b> | ||
* Items Sara emailed Paul about | * Items Sara emailed Paul about, e.g. those in Japan Report (see new section below) | ||
* Laureate Education (i.e. Sylvan) | * Laureate Education (i.e. Sylvan) | ||
* Career Education (similar) | * Career Education (similar) | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<b>OTHER LIST OF QUESTIONS EMAILED </b> | |||
* Do you feel that ALL occurrences of abbreviations should redirect to the full programme names, with the actual content residing under the full name page? (e.g. move the UKeU content to a full name page, with the abbreviation page set as a redirect only?) Also, should we "activate" ALL abbreviation links, i.e. on the programmes list *and* within each programme page? Where they occur in country pages, etc? | |||
* So far I see only a workshop programme (in Spanish) for the | |||
Ibero-American forum... http://www.online-educa.com/iberoamerica-forum-programme. Shall I | |||
troll the entities that look like potentially relevant programmes or | |||
leave it for now? Anything jump out for you? | |||
* Should new additions have glaring relevance to | |||
Re.ViCa (i.e. distance learning oozing from their pores already) or is | |||
it enough that <name> mentions a recent visit to meet with their | |||
dean? | |||
* How far from academia do we stray? The Pipeline Project at | |||
http://www.pipeline-project.org/ is of interest but I take it that a | |||
"prisoner education" project too far out of bounds for our purposes? |
Revision as of 06:39, 25 November 2008
Added Nov 15 2008:
Here is my "Do We Add" list. Some of the items below are not programmes but are lists themselves. Do I pull this institutions from the lists? Etc. Actually, there will be some notes below as well...
Please add four tildes in sequence when saving your changes so I know who wrote what and when - thank you!
DO WE ADD
- Items Sara emailed Paul about, e.g. those in Japan Report (see new section below)
- Laureate Education (i.e. Sylvan)
- Career Education (similar)
- Fédération Interuniversitaire de l’Enseignement à Distance - FIED (Karran)
- From InnoUniLearning:
- Wirtschaft university, vienna
- Univ. Porto - under Major e-learning initiatives in Portugal
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
- Institut d’Administration des Entreprises de Caen (Institute of Corporation
- ENIC Lille
- Various from Laura Czerniewicz reports (sent to Paul)
- Items at http://www.eden-online.org/eden.php?menuId=402&contentId=717
- Per geteducated.com email from Paul: The Top 12 Best Online Management Masters degrees, all available at a cost under $21,000 are offered by: #1 University of Missouri Columbia ($9,854); #2 Mountain State University ($11,700); and #3 University of Missouri Columbia ($11,700).
- CSU Global (CO) (do we care?)
- The eLearning industry and market in Europe - Lot 1: Appendix to Synthesis Report by Jane Massy
- All from Canada country report?
- Colombia country report - I cannot evaluate, all sites in Spanish
- Denmark country report - many listed with no real weighting - add all?
- Germany country report - I cannot evaluate, most sites in German
SaraFrankBristow 21:40, 15 November 2008 (CET)
OTHER LIST OF QUESTIONS EMAILED
- Do you feel that ALL occurrences of abbreviations should redirect to the full programme names, with the actual content residing under the full name page? (e.g. move the UKeU content to a full name page, with the abbreviation page set as a redirect only?) Also, should we "activate" ALL abbreviation links, i.e. on the programmes list *and* within each programme page? Where they occur in country pages, etc?
- So far I see only a workshop programme (in Spanish) for the
Ibero-American forum... http://www.online-educa.com/iberoamerica-forum-programme. Shall I troll the entities that look like potentially relevant programmes or leave it for now? Anything jump out for you?
- Should new additions have glaring relevance to
Re.ViCa (i.e. distance learning oozing from their pores already) or is it enough that <name> mentions a recent visit to meet with their dean?
- How far from academia do we stray? The Pipeline Project at
http://www.pipeline-project.org/ is of interest but I take it that a "prisoner education" project too far out of bounds for our purposes?