Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki
England: Difference between revisions
Giles Pepler (talk | contribs) |
Giles Pepler (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
=Quality assurance= | =Quality assurance= | ||
(mainly sourced from: [http://www. | (mainly sourced from: [http://www.] and [http://www.]) | ||
==Schools== | ==Schools== |
Revision as of 15:16, 5 July 2011
Partners situated in England
[[]]
England in a nutshell
(mainly sourced from: [http://])
Source: original picture on https://www.
Education in England
(mainly sourced from: [2] and [3])
Schools in England
(mainly sourced from: [4], [5] and [6])
Pre-Primary education
Basic education
The post-compulsory level
General upper secondary education
Vocational education
Further and higher education
(mainly sourced from: [7])
Universities in England
Polytechnics in England
Education reform
Schools
Post-secondary
Administration and finance
(mainly sourced from: [8] and [9])
Schools
Upper secondary
Vocational Education
Quality assurance
(mainly sourced from: [10] and [11])
Schools
Post-secondary
Finnish Information Society
From 2003 to 2007 The Finnish Government Information Society Programme was acting to improve competitiveness and productivity, to promote social and regional equality and to improve citizens' well-being and quality of life through effective use of information and communications technologies. The Programme consisted of seven sub-sectors:
- telecommunication infrastructure and digital television
- citizens' ability to utilise the information society and security
- training, working life, research and development
- utilisation of ICT in public administration
- electronic commerce and digital contents
- legislative measures and
- international dimension
Work of the The Government Information Society Programme was continued by Ubiquitous Information Society Advisory Board from 2007 to 2011. The Board had around 40 members from the involved Ministries, public administration, NGOs and business life. The Advisory Board aimed to transform Finland into an internationally recognized, competitive, competence-based service society with a human touch.
The Advisory Board had the duty to:
- draw up an action plan for the national information society strategy
- monitor and coordinate the implementation of the action plan
- accommodate the measures of the action plan and ensure that they are consistent with one another
- maintain cooperation with other players in the information society development
- integrate and coordinate information security work in the information society
- promote the introduction and development of reliable electronic identification systems
- promote the copyright system from the viewpoint of the information society
- take new initiatives to speed up the national information society development
- monitor the information society development at international and EU level and
- report annually to the Government about the implementation of the action plan.
Read the action plan of Ubiquitous Information Society Advisory Board in pdf-format: http://www.arjentietoyhteiskunta.fi/files/73/Esite_englanniksi.pdf or open a PowerPoint slideshow http://www.arjentietoyhteiskunta.fi/files/29/National_Information_Society_Policy_in_short.ppt
The Advisory Board worked in six working groups to fulfill its aims:
- Information security working group
- Electronic identification development group
- Near Field Communication working group
- Media forum for children and young people
- Utilizing the benefits of ICT in teaching and studying working group (this group crew up to be a major project, read a brief description from a word document http://www.arjentietoyhteiskunta.fi/files/220/paivitys_arjentietoyhteiskunta_engl_191109.docx)
- working group on opening public information of the Finnish public sector
Statistics
For a number of years Statistics Finland has been describing evolvement of the information society in Finland. Compilations have been published on the topic and annual statistics are produced on the use of information and communications technology.
There are for example following statistics:
Finnish Information Society 2020
source: Sitra, the Finnish Innovation Fund
The following vision of the Finnish information society was developed in collaboration with the Ministry of Transport and Communications as a contribution to the information society strategy process. Discussion on the vision continues.
- The foundation for the Finnish information society in 2020 is humanity, with a focus on developing new services and technologies that are meaningful, safe and accessible. Ease of use ensures that the digitized culture includes all citizens. Climate change makes electronic services even more important: it pays to prefer bits to atoms.
- The quality of services is measured by ease of use and relevance. High-quality services are personalized and predictable. The focus in healthcare, for example, is on holistic promotion of health, which includes social factors as well as medical viewpoints.
- Virtual is real, and reality is virtual. High-quality information networks have become vitally important, as have securing maintenance and support for these networks. Automation and artificial intelligence have freed employees from routine tasks, but technology can never replace meaningful human contact. This is particularly true of sectors such as the care-giving industry.
- In the information society, innovation springs from sharing information in networks across organizations, beyond traditional hierarchies and information silos. Business can no longer be based on control, but on joint efforts to improve and evolve. A multidisciplinary innovation environment has already boosted Finland’s position in global competition, providing opportunities for big and small businesses alike.
- Important and productive work involves global interaction and collaboration. Success results from a commitment to shared values—from having reached an understanding of common goals through discussion. The ability to collaborate is measured by what are known as collaboration credits, and collaboration is managed across organizational borders.
- Communication skills across professional, linguistic and cultural barriers are crucial. Information work and global partnerships require new practices that differ from those in the industrial society, where work was tied to a certain place and certain hours. Play and creativity are important for both individual well-being and the common good, generating something genuinely new.
- The importance of digital materials and networks is stressed in learning, as are learning styles and strategies—in other words, learning to learn. A good, well-rounded education allows for equal citizenship in an information society. Learning takes place at all ages in schools, at the workplace, during free time. Schools emphasize a culture of shared improvement, which is based on sharing information and skills and learning from mistakes. Game-like elements aid learning.
- In the information society, public administration assumes the role of enabler, which allows people and businesses more influence. Public administration consistently promotes open operating models and practical use of information, creating new opportunities for everyone.
- Publicly produced content—including maps, statistics and public service media content—are under an open licence, and raw data are available for anyone to use and develop further, as long as privacy and public safety are not compromised. All personal information is the property of the individual and easily available when needed. All relevant health information, for example, is available regardless of place of care. This is achieved through open information interfaces.
- The line between the public and the private sectors becomes meaningless as a result of cooperation. The public sector is efficient and flexible, and businesses contribute to the common good. The right to services and opportunities to participate and contribute no longer depend on regional borders. The growing importance of natural resources and the countryside supports this trend.
- The information society increases direct democracy and work toward common goals. Administrative processes are preceded and supported by citizen discussions and by experimental projects that provide information about new phenomena and processes before they are implemented on a larger scale. Citizens, organizations and businesses have the right to propose new legislation.
- National and municipal facilitators and the media, among others, break down extensive and difficult issues into smaller topics for discussion, without taking a position. Materials related to decision-making are available to citizens and policy-makers alike in easily comparable and understandable formats. Discussions focus on presenting the premises for decisions in concrete and comprehensible terms.
ICT in education initiatives
Virtual initiatives in schools
Virtual initiatives in post-secondary education
Lessons learnt
General lessons
Notable practices
References
- Education and Reserch 2007-2012, Development Plan
- Key competences for lifelong learning in Finland; Education 2010 – interim report
- The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment
Relevant websites
- European Commission
- The Government Program
- Finnish Ministry of Education (MINEDU)
- The Finnish National Board of Education
- This is Finland
- Finnish Online University of Applied Sciences
- Finnish Virtual University
- Statistics Finland
- Ubiquitous Information Society Advisory Board
- European Schooling Finland
- The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC)
- KOTA statistical data on universities and fields of education
- The Eurostudent Report
- http://www.opiskelupaikka.fi/In-English
- PISA
- The Finnish Government Information Society Programme 2003-2007
- Surveys and reports commissioned by FICORA
- Statistics and other data on Finnish science and technology
- Finnish Information Society 2020
Contents [hide]
1 Experts situated in Country 2 Country in a nutshell 3 Education in Country 4 Schools in Country 5 Further and Higher education 5.1 Universities in Country 5.2 Polytechnics in Country 5.3 Colleges in Country 6 Education reform 6.1 Schools 6.2 Post-secondary 7 Administration and finance 7.1 Schools 7.2 Post-secondary 8 Quality assurance 8.1 Schools 8.2 Post-secondary 9 Information society 10 ICT in education initiatives 10.1 Virtual initiatives in schools 10.2 Virtual initiatives in post-secondary education 11 Lessons learnt 11.1 General lessons 11.2 Notable practices 12 References
Experts situated in Country
Country in a nutshell
Education in Country
Schools in Country
Further and Higher education
Universities in Country
Polytechnics in Country
Colleges in Country
Education reform
Schools
Post-secondary
Administration and finance
Schools
Post-secondary
Quality assurance
Schools
Post-secondary
Information society
ICT in education initiatives
Virtual initiatives in schools
Virtual initiatives in post-secondary education
Lessons learnt
General lessons
Notable practices
References