Welcome to the Virtual Education Wiki ~ Open Education Wiki

Interactive University: Difference between revisions

From Virtual Education Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(entry)
(add abbrev)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The phrase "interactive university" could refer to many entities but the capitalised phrase "Interactive University" is normally taken to refer to the [[Interactive University]] which flourished in [[Scotland]] until closed in 2007.
The phrase "interactive university" could refer to many entities but the capitalised phrase "Interactive University" (IU) is normally taken to refer to the [[Interactive University]] which flourished in [[Scotland]] until closed in 2007.


The Interactive University was an organisation to help develop and promote interactive eLearning for global e-education markets. It was established in 2002 as a joint initiative between [[Heriot Watt University]] and Scottish Enterprise (the national economic development agency for Scotland), with headquarters in Edinburgh. Managed by a team which offered both business expertise and academic experience, the University set out to create a radical new model for global learning. It was initially quite successful but had to return to Scottish Enterprise for further funding in 2007 - after much discussion the funding request was rejected and the University closed shortly afterwards.
The Interactive University was an organisation to help develop and promote interactive eLearning for global e-education markets. It was established in 2002 as a joint initiative between [[Heriot Watt University]] and Scottish Enterprise (the national economic development agency for Scotland), with headquarters in Edinburgh. Managed by a team which offered both business expertise and academic experience, the University set out to create a radical new model for global learning. It was initially quite successful but had to return to Scottish Enterprise for further funding in 2007 - after much discussion the funding request was rejected and the University closed shortly afterwards.
Line 9: Line 9:


No other substantial report is known to be publicly available - indeed, no other substantial report is known of.
No other substantial report is known to be publicly available - indeed, no other substantial report is known of.
However, there is a presentation by the then CEO at http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/flexibleDelivery/RoyLeitchInteractiveUniversity.ppt - interestingly (with hindsight) on a session on "sustainability".


== Documentation of recent situation ==
== Documentation of recent situation ==


As noted by Seb Schmoller in his blog posting [http://fm.schmoller.net/2007/04/the_scotsman_re.html The Scotsman reports that the Interactive University is to shut at the end of May]:  
As noted by Seb Schmoller in his blog posting [http://fm.schmoller.net/2007/04/the_scotsman_re.html The Scotsman reported that the Interactive University is to shut at the end of May 2007]:  


: On 17 April 2007, ''The Scotsman'' newspaper reported that the Interactive University (IU), which has been held up as one of the few UK examples of apparently* successful large-scale provision of on line university-level education, and which was recruiting staff until recently, "is to close its doors at the end of next month", after "it failed to attract participation from the majority of Scottish universities and a bid for a lifeline £1.5 million from Scottish Enterprise was refused". For a detailed review of the Interactive University, written for the UKeUniversity before the latter had the plug finally pulled on it, see this 2004 report by Sara Frank Bristow, edited by Paul Bacsich [180 kB DOC].
: On 17 April 2007, ''The Scotsman'' newspaper reported that the Interactive University (IU), which has been held up as one of the few UK examples of apparently* successful large-scale provision of on line university-level education, and which was recruiting staff until recently, "is to close its doors at the end of next month", after "it failed to attract participation from the majority of Scottish universities and a bid for a lifeline £1.5 million from Scottish Enterprise was refused". For a detailed review of the Interactive University, written for the UKeUniversity before the latter had the plug finally pulled on it, see this 2004 report by Sara Frank Bristow, edited by Paul Bacsich [180 kB DOC].


: * I say "apparently" as I am very sceptical about the approach to content development described by the IU. In my experience "ensuring that the whole content production process is completely independent of the end method of delivery" is neither a realistic nor a desirable endeavour.
: * I say "apparently" as I am very sceptical about the approach to content development described by the IU. In my experience "ensuring that the whole content production process is completely independent of the end method of delivery" is neither a realistic nor a desirable endeavour.
The last paragraph of Schmoller's posting makes it less certain that the Interactive University would make a good case study. However, there are many European countries with about the population of Scotland and this model could have some relevance to them.




Line 27: Line 28:
<br>
<br>
> [[European Union]]
> [[European Union]]
<br><br>
>> [[Main Page]]
[[Category:United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Scotland]]
[[Category:National initiatives|United Kingdom Interactive University]]
[[Category:FELIs]]

Latest revision as of 04:11, 23 October 2009

The phrase "interactive university" could refer to many entities but the capitalised phrase "Interactive University" (IU) is normally taken to refer to the Interactive University which flourished in Scotland until closed in 2007.

The Interactive University was an organisation to help develop and promote interactive eLearning for global e-education markets. It was established in 2002 as a joint initiative between Heriot Watt University and Scottish Enterprise (the national economic development agency for Scotland), with headquarters in Edinburgh. Managed by a team which offered both business expertise and academic experience, the University set out to create a radical new model for global learning. It was initially quite successful but had to return to Scottish Enterprise for further funding in 2007 - after much discussion the funding request was rejected and the University closed shortly afterwards.


Reports

The main report on Interactive University is the Competitor Analysis: Interactive University written by Sara Frank Bristow for UKeU in 2003 and finalised in early 2004), updated by Paul Bacsich in summer 2005. As part of the updating process, the earlier version of the report was passed to Interactive University staff for comment.

No other substantial report is known to be publicly available - indeed, no other substantial report is known of.

However, there is a presentation by the then CEO at http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/flexibleDelivery/RoyLeitchInteractiveUniversity.ppt - interestingly (with hindsight) on a session on "sustainability".


Documentation of recent situation

As noted by Seb Schmoller in his blog posting The Scotsman reported that the Interactive University is to shut at the end of May 2007:

On 17 April 2007, The Scotsman newspaper reported that the Interactive University (IU), which has been held up as one of the few UK examples of apparently* successful large-scale provision of on line university-level education, and which was recruiting staff until recently, "is to close its doors at the end of next month", after "it failed to attract participation from the majority of Scottish universities and a bid for a lifeline £1.5 million from Scottish Enterprise was refused". For a detailed review of the Interactive University, written for the UKeUniversity before the latter had the plug finally pulled on it, see this 2004 report by Sara Frank Bristow, edited by Paul Bacsich [180 kB DOC].
* I say "apparently" as I am very sceptical about the approach to content development described by the IU. In my experience "ensuring that the whole content production process is completely independent of the end method of delivery" is neither a realistic nor a desirable endeavour.



> Programmes

> Europe
> European Union

>> Main Page