Key Success Factors - Revision history

Pbacsich: added brief explanation and link to key success factor

2009-06-04T13:02:34Z

added brief explanation and link to key success factor

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 4 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''''This is the table of Key Success Factors created for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.'''''		'''''This is the table of Key Success Factors created for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.'''''

			A [[key success factor]] is a factor whose presence is necessary for an organisation to fulfil its mission, for some subset of virtual campuses - such as National initiatives. In other words, it is a [[critical success factor]] across that subset.


	{\| border="1"		{\| border="1"
	\|+ table of Key Success Factors		\|+ table of Key Success Factors with indication of which types of virtual campus they apply to
	!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions		!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions
	\|-		\|-

Pbacsich at 12:00, 4 June 2009

2009-06-04T12:00:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 4 June 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:
	\|-		\|-
	\|R34		\|R34
	\|~~Recruitmnent~~ of Staff		\|Recruitment of Staff
	\|The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning		\|The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning
	\|		\|

Pbacsich: tidy format and add links

2009-06-04T12:00:00Z

tidy format and add links

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 4 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\| border=~~”1”~~		'''''This is the table of Key Success Factors created for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.'''''

			{\| border="1"
	\|+ table of Key Success Factors		\|+ table of Key Success Factors
	!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions		!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions
Line 6:		Line 8:
	\|Collaboration for e-Learning		\|Collaboration for e-Learning
	\|The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems.		\|The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems.
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 20:		Line 22:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
Line 27:		Line 29:
	\|Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues		\|Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 38:		Line 40:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 50:		Line 52:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|maybe		\|align="center"\|maybe
	\|-		\|-
	\|R37		\|R37
Line 59:		Line 61:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 66:		Line 68:
	\|Consortia No-Compete		\|Consortia No-Compete
	\|The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved		\|The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 76:		Line 78:
	\|Consortia Roles Definition		\|Consortia Roles Definition
	\|Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners.		\|Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners.
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 86:		Line 88:
	\|Consortia Role Implementation		\|Consortia Role Implementation
	\|Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners.		\|Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners.
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
Line 101:		Line 103:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|-		\|-
	\|R56		\|R56
Line 110:		Line 112:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|maybe		\|align="center"\|maybe
	\|-		\|-
	\|R59		\|R59
Line 120:		Line 122:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|maybe		\|align="center"\|maybe
	\|-		\|-
	\|R82		\|R82
Line 129:		Line 131:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
Line 140:		Line 142:
	\|		\|
	\|		\|
	\|X		\|align="center"\|X
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}


			----
			> [[Critical Success Factors]]
			<br>
			>> [[Main Page]]

Pbacsich: entry slap-down of table

2009-06-04T11:39:27Z

entry slap-down of table

New page

{| border=”1”
|+ table of Key Success Factors
!Code!!Factor name!!Critical Success Factor (level 5 statement)!!Consortia!!National initiatives!!Newly created institutions!!Evolution of existing institutions!!For-profits!!Public institutions
|-
|R24
|Collaboration for e-Learning
|The institution has a reasoned approach to collaboration at various levels to gain additional benefit from sharing e-learning material, methodologies and systems.
|X
|X
|
|
|
|
|-
|R25
|Brand Management
|The institution has a reasoned approach to managing its brand
|
|
|
|
|X
|
|-
|R32
|Worldware for Students
|Students can on the whole make use of widely-used hardware and software thus minimising cost and support issues
|
|X
|
|X
|
|
|-
|R34
|Recruitmnent of Staff
|The institution has effective processes designed to attract, for appropriate roles, employees enthusiastic about e-learning
|
|
|X
|
|
|
|-
|R36
|Pricing
|The institution has effective processes which ensure that the price of its courses are competitive yet sustainable.
|
|
|
|
|X
|maybe
|-
|R37
|Innovation Management
|The institution has a balanced approach to encouraging innovation and innovators within the constraints of delivering effective services attractive to students.
|
|
|
|X
|
|
|-
|R41
|Consortia No-Compete
|The consortium has taken steps to ensure that issues of competing with its members are resolved
|X
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|R42
|Consortia Roles Definition
|Each member of the consortium has a reasoned, evidenced and documented approach to collaboration with partners.
|X
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|R43
|Consortia Role Implementation
|Each member of the consortium implements the collaboration role it agreed with its partners.
|X
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|R55
|Foresight
|Both look-ahead and lab, working in concert; at least one of these should be a sector leader.
|
|
|
|
|
|X
|-
|R56
|Selling
|Widespread skill in selling e-learning and the theory to support the skills.
|
|
|
|
|X
|maybe
|-
|R59
|Competitor Research
|The institution has processes to carefully analyse the relationship of each proposed e-learning offering to existing providers and stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
|X
|maybe
|-
|R82
|Dissemination Internal
|A systematic managed process of internal dissemination of good practice in e-learning aspects of courses is in place.
|
|
|
|X
|
|
|-
|R99
|Organisational Learning
|Institution is a learning organisation on all core aspects of e-learning.
|
|
|
|
|X
|
|}