Critical Success Factors - Revision history

Pbacsich: catted

2019-07-10T09:37:20Z

catted

Pbacsich: added link to Benchmarking

2012-03-27T04:42:17Z

added link to Benchmarking

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 27 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''''See also [[Benchmarking]]'''''

	''These critical success factors are for '''virtual campuses in universities and colleges'''. It is likely that the factors for '''virtual schools''' will be slightly different.''		''These critical success factors are for '''virtual campuses in universities and colleges'''. It is likely that the factors for '''virtual schools''' will be slightly different.''

Pbacsich: updated to VISCED level

2011-06-09T15:56:09Z

updated to VISCED level

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 9 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			''These critical success factors are for '''virtual campuses in universities and colleges'''. It is likely that the factors for '''virtual schools''' will be slightly different.''


	=='''Definition'''==		=='''Definition'''==

Line 162:		Line 165:
	* [[Critical Success Factors initial version]]		* [[Critical Success Factors initial version]]
	<br>		<br>


	=== Other Languages ===		=== Other Languages ===
Line 172:		Line 176:

	----		----
			> [[VISCED]]
			<br>
			> [[Re.ViCa]]
			<br><br>
	> [[Main Page]]		> [[Main Page]]

Urintala: /* Third International Advisory Commitee meeting */

2009-08-21T08:21:51Z

Third International Advisory Commitee meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 21 August 2009
Line 55:		Line 55:
	=== Third International Advisory Commitee meeting ===		=== Third International Advisory Commitee meeting ===

	A considerable amount of ~~works~~ has been done in preparation for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.		A considerable amount of work has been done in preparation for the IAC meeting at the ICDE Conference, Maastricht, June 2009.

	First, a close look was taken at all the feedback from IAC.		First, a close look was taken at all the feedback from IAC.

Urintala: /* Second International Advisory Commitee meeting */

2009-08-21T08:20:49Z

Second International Advisory Commitee meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 21 August 2009
Line 43:		Line 43:
	=== Second International Advisory Commitee meeting ===		=== Second International Advisory Commitee meeting ===

	In a second meeting, at the ONLINE EDUCA Annual Conference in Berlin, December 2008, we let the International Advisory Committee (N= 17) vote on the 29 CSFs, using an electronic voting system in which they could give an opinion about the factors whether they must be kept or removed from the list of . The categories to answer on were:		In a second meeting, at the ONLINE EDUCA Annual Conference in Berlin, December 2008, we let the International Advisory Committee (N= 17) vote on the 29 CSFs, using an electronic voting system in which they could give an opinion about the factors whether they must be kept or removed from the list. The categories to answer on were:

	# must be removed		# must be removed

Alessandro.Caforio: /* Other Languages */

2009-07-27T17:24:05Z

Other Languages

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 27 July 2009
Line 165:		Line 165:
	=== Other Languages ===		=== Other Languages ===

	This document is available :		This document is available also in:

	* [[Fattori Critici di Successo]] - Italiano		* [[Fattori Critici di Successo]] - Italiano

Alessandro.Caforio: /* Earlier versions */

2009-07-27T17:22:13Z

Earlier versions

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 27 July 2009
Line 161:		Line 161:
	* [[Critical Success Factors second version]]		* [[Critical Success Factors second version]]
	* [[Critical Success Factors initial version]]		* [[Critical Success Factors initial version]]
			<br>

			=== Other Languages ===

			This document is available :

			* [[Fattori Critici di Successo]] - Italiano

	<br>		<br>

	----		----
	> [[Main Page]]		> [[Main Page]]

IOpdebeeck: /* Third International Advisory Commitee meeting */

2009-06-07T21:48:46Z

Third International Advisory Commitee meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 7 June 2009
Line 61:		Line 61:
	Second, four related schemes were analysed or re-analysed.		Second, four related schemes were analysed or re-analysed.
	# [[MegaTrends]] is the main study on large-scale virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. Its final list of factors is quite short. It has several lessons for us.		# [[MegaTrends]] is the main study on large-scale virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. Its final list of factors is quite short. It has several lessons for us.
	# ~~'''~~PBP-VC~~'''~~ is the main study on consortia-based virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. It has a strong focus on quality issues and on good practice for managing consortia but among the details there are a few lessons for CSFs in the consortial area.		# [[PBP-VC]] is the main study on consortia-based virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. It has a strong focus on quality issues and on good practice for managing consortia but among the details there are a few lessons for CSFs in the consortial area.
	# [[UNIQUe]] is a scheme for quality/accreditation in e-learning developed by a consortium involving EuroPACE. In some ways it is parallel to E-xcellence though possibly more oriented to on-campus and blended uses of e-learning. Despite many of the criteria being more focussed on quality, there are some lessons to be learned, including on rewriting certain Critical Success Factors.		# [[UNIQUe]] is a scheme for quality/accreditation in e-learning developed by a consortium involving EuroPACE. In some ways it is parallel to E-xcellence though possibly more oriented to on-campus and blended uses of e-learning. Despite many of the criteria being more focussed on quality, there are some lessons to be learned, including on rewriting certain Critical Success Factors.
	# [[E-xcellence]] is a scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning developed in 2005-2006 by a consortium led by EADTU. It is often felt to still be most relevant to distance teaching organisations. It has earlier been taken into consideration for our CSF work but this work was rechecked.		# [[E-xcellence]] is a scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning developed in 2005-2006 by a consortium led by EADTU. It is often felt to still be most relevant to distance teaching organisations. It has earlier been taken into consideration for our CSF work but this work was rechecked.

IOpdebeeck: /* Third International Advisory Commitee meeting */

2009-06-07T21:36:22Z

Third International Advisory Commitee meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 7 June 2009
Line 63:		Line 63:
	# '''PBP-VC''' is the main study on consortia-based virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. It has a strong focus on quality issues and on good practice for managing consortia but among the details there are a few lessons for CSFs in the consortial area.		# '''PBP-VC''' is the main study on consortia-based virtual campuses done before Re.ViCa. It has a strong focus on quality issues and on good practice for managing consortia but among the details there are a few lessons for CSFs in the consortial area.
	# [[UNIQUe]] is a scheme for quality/accreditation in e-learning developed by a consortium involving EuroPACE. In some ways it is parallel to E-xcellence though possibly more oriented to on-campus and blended uses of e-learning. Despite many of the criteria being more focussed on quality, there are some lessons to be learned, including on rewriting certain Critical Success Factors.		# [[UNIQUe]] is a scheme for quality/accreditation in e-learning developed by a consortium involving EuroPACE. In some ways it is parallel to E-xcellence though possibly more oriented to on-campus and blended uses of e-learning. Despite many of the criteria being more focussed on quality, there are some lessons to be learned, including on rewriting certain Critical Success Factors.
	# [~~http://www.eadtu.nl/e-xcellenceqs/~~ E-xcellence] is a scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning developed in 2005-2006 by a consortium led by EADTU. It is often felt to still be most relevant to distance teaching organisations. It has earlier been taken into consideration for our CSF work but this work was rechecked.		# [[E-xcellence]] is a scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning developed in 2005-2006 by a consortium led by EADTU. It is often felt to still be most relevant to distance teaching organisations. It has earlier been taken into consideration for our CSF work but this work was rechecked.

	Third, related activity on benchmarking/quality of e-learning in the UK had generated some comments on criterion wording and some new criteria, which were taken into consideration.		Third, related activity on benchmarking/quality of e-learning in the UK had generated some comments on criterion wording and some new criteria, which were taken into consideration.

Pbacsich: /* Third International Advisory Commitee meeting */

2009-06-04T11:16:11Z

Third International Advisory Commitee meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 4 June 2009
Line 72:		Line 72:

	# a list of 17 Critical Success Factors relevant to success of e-learning in all types of Virtual Campus.		# a list of 17 Critical Success Factors relevant to success of e-learning in all types of Virtual Campus.
	# a list of 14 Key Success Factors - these are Critical Success Factors relevant to success of e-learning in one or more subsets (categories) of Virtual Campus - such as private for-profit providers, consortia, etc.		# a list of 14 [[Key Success Factors]] - these are Critical Success Factors relevant to success of e-learning in one or more subsets (categories) of Virtual Campus - such as private for-profit providers, consortia, etc.

	It should be remembered that the Critical Success Factors are drawn from a much larger scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning, which makes it easy to promote or demote Critical Success Factors and Key Success Factors as further case study and country report information becomes available. For more details on the underlying scheme see [http://elearning.heacademy.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Pick%26Mix Pick&Mix].		It should be remembered that the Critical Success Factors are drawn from a much larger scheme of benchmarking/quality for e-learning, which makes it easy to promote or demote Critical Success Factors and Key Success Factors as further case study and country report information becomes available. For more details on the underlying scheme see [http://elearning.heacademy.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Pick%26Mix Pick&Mix].