http://openeducation.wiki/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=DroneLtvid 2026-05-17T06:58:51Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.39.1 http://openeducation.wiki/w/index.php?title=Swiss_Virtual_Campus_-_Case_study_(F)&diff=18519 2009-09-02T05:09:32Z

<p>DroneLtvid: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;!-- This is the template for &quot;case study&quot; entries --&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Start with a very brief overview as for mini case studies - Programmes --&gt;<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVC logo.JPG ||right|250px|SVC logo]]<br /> Le programme [[Campus Virtuel Suisse]] (Campus Virtuale Svizzera, Swiss Virtual Campus, Virtueller Campus Schweiz, ABBREV: [[SVC]]) encourage la formation supérieure via l'internet au sein des hautes écoles suisses (universités, hautes écoles spécialisées, écoles polytechniques fédérales). Les étudiant-e-s ne sont ainsi plus liés à un programme de cours strict mais peuvent acquérir un savoir à toute heure et en tout lieu.<br /> <br /> Le programme CVS a été lancé en 1999 sur proposition de la CUS et de sa commission de planification afin de promouvoir lʼutilisation des nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication dans les hautes écoles suisses. Outre cet objectif général, ce programme mettait la priorité sur la création dʼunités dʼenseignement disponibles sur Internet qui pourraient être utilisées par les étudiants de différentes institutions et qui pourraient être reconnues dans leurs cursus.<br /> <br /> Les objectifs globaux de politique générale, tels quʼénoncés dans le Message du Conseil fédéral pour lʼencouragement de la formation, de la recherche et de la technologie pendant les années 2000–2003, consistaient à encourager la coopération entre les hautes écoles afin de promouvoir lʼinnovation dans les méthodes pédagogiques et de produire du matériel de formation de haute qualité. Ce programme faisait partie des activités gérées par la CUS en vertu de la Loi fédérale sur lʼaide aux universités (LAU) afin dʼencourager la coopération et la modernisation du système suisse dʼéducation supérieure.<br /> <br /> Si les objectifs globaux du programme nʼont pas été modifiés, la seconde phase (phase de consolidation; 2004-2007) a toutefois donné lieu à des changements significatifs dans la <br /> stratégie de mise en oeuvre du projet, en prenant également en compte lʼobjectif formulé dans la planification pluriannuelle de la Conférence des Recteurs des Universités Suisses (CRUS), à savoir parvenir à au moins 10% de cours assistés par les nouvelles technologies dʼenseignement. En outre, puisquʼil était prévisible que le programme fédéral prendrait fin (peut-être avec une troisième période de cessation progressive), lʼun des objectifs généraux du programme de consolidation était que les hautes écoles elles-mêmes assument la responsabilité du développement du e-learning.<br /> <br /> Ces objectifs généraux ont débouché sur un objectif plus précis: développer un Centre de compétence, de service et de production (CCSP) dans chaque haute école suisse. Ces centres devaient consister en des équipes professionnelles dotées des compétences technologiques et <br /> pédagogiques requises pour élaborer des cours en e-learning, avec deux avantages principaux: <br /> 1) assurer lʼaccumulation à long terme de compétences et dʼexpériences dans ce domaine, donc au-delà de lʼobjectif des projets individuels;<br /> 2) réduire les coûts de développement grâce aux effets dʼéconomies dʼéchelle et transférer ces expériences dʼun projet à lʼautre. En outre, ces centres devaient permettre une meilleure intégration des projets CVS à la stratégie universitaire globale. Un financement supplémentaire a également été alloué à des projets préexistants afin dʼaider à les maintenir et à les intégrer au sein des universités participantes.<br /> <br /> Enfin, deux appels à propositions pour de nouveaux projets ont été lancés en 2004 et 2005. Si<br /> les principes généraux étaient les mêmes que durant la phase d'impulsion, lʼapproche de lʼenseignement mixte (blended learning) était officiellement avalisée dans lʼappel à propositions, tandis que le CCSP de la leading house était simultanément chargé de produire les modules de e-learning en collaboration avec le chef de projet.<br /> <br /> <br /> 82 cours en ligne ont déjà été développés dans les disciplines les plus diverses. 30 autres cours de la 4ème et dernière série sont en développement.<br /> <br /> Le site web du Campus Virtuel Suisse: http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVC network.JPG|thumb|right|400px|SCV cooperation network]]<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Say something brief about its mission etc. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- Say something brief about the teaching methods, number of students, staff etc. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- Say something about membership of international organisations if relevant. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- That completes the stub. Now follows the 10 sections of the Case study format. --&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> == Institution ==<br /> <br /> === The present ===<br /> <br /> * '''(1) Provide a general description of the institution in its current state, putting the e-learning into context'''.<br /> <br /> The Swiss Virtual Campus programme ended on July 31st, 2008. <br /> No head and coordination is active at the moment.<br /> The local centers are continuing to do use the virtual content.<br /> Last update of SVC website : May 08, 2007.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(2) What is the institution's annual budget?'''<br /> <br /> Des 44 millions de francs de contributions fédérales alloués au CVS (fonds de<br /> l‘OFES, de l‘OFFT et du Conseil EPF réunis), 37 millions ont été affectés à<br /> l‘encouragement de projet du CVS. Ces montants ont été complétés par les<br /> „matching funds“ exigés des responsables de projet, atteignant un volume de<br /> financement similaire. On peut ainsi admettre que le volume total maximal des<br /> projets CVS oscillait entre 70 et 75 millions de francs.<br /> <br /> * '''(3) How many students does the institution have (a) in total? (b) as full-time equivalents?'''<br /> <br /> Number of Students in 2004 approx. 4/5 from cantonal universities; approx. 1/10 from<br /> the ETH domain; approx. 1/8 from UAS<br /> <br /> * approx. 9’800 students at cantonal Universities (from 35 projects);<br /> * approx. 1’300 students at the ETHZ / EPFL (from 9 projects);<br /> * approx. 1’400 students at Universities of Applied Sciences (from 14 projects); <br /> * totally approx. 12'500 SVC students at Swiss Institutions of Higher Education; but this number is hardly reached every semester. <br /> 33 project teams indicate to have regularly more than 100 students. 27 of these projects started with regular courses in 2003 or before.<br /> <br /> * '''(4) How many staff does the institution have (a) in total? (b) as full-time equivalents?'''<br /> <br /> Approx. 1020 names of persons having worked for the SVC were indicated up to now (the data from one project are missing).<br /> <br /> Person-years invested: average: approx. 12 personyears per project; approx. 2/5 financed by the SVC.<br /> Totally at least approx. 600 person-years were invested into SVC projects. Before the start of the projects approx. 44 person-years were already invested into the themes of the projects; the SVC financed at least approx. 253 person-years (from one project the data are missing).<br /> <br /> * '''(5) What is the institution's &quot;business model&quot;? (a) public (b) private (c) consortium (d) national programme. If (c) or (d) above, list the other partners (or the members) and for each briefly describe its role.'''<br /> * '''(6) What percentage of the institution's students are based outside the home country?'''<br /> * '''(7) Describe the institution's approach to virtual mobility.'''<br /> <br /> Considering the official goals and objectives of the SVC programme as they<br /> were set in the Federal Message of 1998 and in the two calls for proposals, the<br /> degree to which the SVC programme has met its objectives is clearly limited. In<br /> particular, the objectives to “set up a virtual campus” or to “develop a substantial<br /> offer in distance-learning” have not been met. These objectives have not found<br /> strong support amongst the majority of the stakeholders, and this may explain why<br /> so few of the SVC projects were aimed at developing distance-learning<br /> programmes. As a result, the SVC programme has not been as successful as<br /> expected promoting real virtual mobility among the student population.<br /> <br /> Percentage of Self Study or Distance Learning<br /> 1/4 for each group:<br /> 1. below or near 50%;<br /> 2. between 50% and 80%;<br /> 3. 80% or more;<br /> 4. depends on the course<br /> <br /> details:<br /> * 2 projects: below 20% ; 6 projects: between 20% and 50%;<br /> * 4 projects: near 50%;<br /> * 12 projects: between 50% and 80%;<br /> * 12 projects: 80% or more. 29 projects could offer more than 80% of distance learning if they wanted it.<br /> 11 projects vary from one extreme to the other, according to the course.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(8) Describe how the institution manages its &quot;brand&quot; (a) in general and (b) in respect of any e-learning aspects.'''<br /> <br /> La taille du projet et lʼampleur de son financement ont inévitablement attiré lʼattention et ont donné un profil plus visible au e-learning.<br /> <br /> === The past ===<br /> <br /> * '''(9) Give a narrative description of the institution's history since its foundation, concentrating on key dates, recent years and any e-learning issues.'''<br /> <br /> * Impulse federal programme 2000–2003<br /> <br /> Le 8 octobre 1999, le Parlement a approuvé le Message présenté par le Conseil<br /> fédéral relatif à l’encouragement de la formation, de la recherche et de la technologie<br /> pour les années 2000 - 2003 (Message FRT 2000-2003) et ainsi accepté le crédit<br /> demandé dans le même temps en faveur d’un programme fédéral échelonné sur<br /> quatre ans et s’intitulant „Encouragement des nouvelles technologies de l’information<br /> et de la communication (NTIC) dans une perspective d’élaboration d’un „Campus<br /> Virtuel Suisse“ 3 .<br /> <br /> The federal programme “Swiss Virtual Campus” (SVC) was launched in October<br /> 1999 as part of an overall process of promoting the “Swiss information society” in<br /> general and, in particular, the use of the new information and communication<br /> technologies (ICT) in higher education. <br /> <br /> Over a period of 4 years (2000 - 2003) and with a sum of approximately SFr. 44 million in federal funds, the SVC programme subsidised projects for the development of virtual teaching and/or learning courses (e-learning courses) by Swiss Universities, Universities of Applied Science and the Federal Institutes of Technology. In order to receive support projects had to be<br /> developed by the cooperation of at least three academic partners and had to focus<br /> on innovations in tertiary teaching “in that they involve complete courses that can be<br /> followed independently via the Internet”.<br /> <br /> In January 2003 the Swiss University Conference (SUC) commissioned an overall<br /> evaluation of the SVC programme. This summative evaluation was intended to<br /> analyze the implementation processes, the outputs and the (potential) impacts of<br /> the SVC programme, considering the objectives set for the programme as well as<br /> the context of the programme.<br /> <br /> goal: 50 e-learning projects must be developed<br /> 2004 : half of the projects were developed.<br /> Ces cinquante<br /> projets du programme ont été sélectionnés et lancés en deux temps. Vingt-huit<br /> projets ont été démarrés lors de la première série, dans le courant de l’été 2000, et<br /> dans la deuxième série du début de l’année 2001, vingt-deux autres projets ont été<br /> autorisés.<br /> <br /> <br /> Tableau n°1: Projets CVS par domaine de connaissances<br /> Domaine de connaissances Nombre de projets<br /> * Sciences de l’art et sciences humaines 7 projets<br /> * Sciences naturelles / Sciences de la vie 9 projets<br /> * Ingénierie, mathématiques, informatique 9 projets<br /> * Economie d’entreprise et gestion financière 6 projets<br /> * Sciences économiques et droit 4 projets<br /> * Médecine 11 projets<br /> * Support éducationnel 4 projets<br /> <br /> <br /> Phase de consolidation<br /> <br /> La phase de consolidation reprend en partie les objectifs de la phase d’impulsion4 en les adaptant et en les enrichissant de l’expérience acquise et du nouveau contexte des hautes écoles et se définit autour de quatre axes majeurs d’intervention5 :<br /> * la création ou la consolidation de Centres de Compétence, de Service et de Production (CCSP) dans chaque haute école : l’idée a été d’assurer l’existence d’une équipe de production au sein de chaque haute école suisse ayant pour rôle de soutenir le développement de nouveaux cours en ligne et la maintenance des cours développés.<br /> * l’utilisation et la maintenance des projets déjà développés : un financement supplémentaire a été accordé aux projets développés au cours de la phase d’impulsion et dont la qualité a été reconnue afin d’en garantir l’utilisation et la pleine intégration dans les cursus;<br /> * le développement de nouveaux cours : au cours de la phase de consolidation, deux appels à projets ont été lancés. Au total, 64 projets ont été développés et soutenus dans le cadre du CVS répartis de la façon suivante : 32 projets pour la 3ème série – auxquels s’ajoutent 2 projets de l’Office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT) qui ont été suivis administrativement par la coordination du CVS mais n’ont pas reçu le label « CVS » – et 30 projets pour la 4ème série.<br /> * la poursuite des services destinés aux hautes écoles et la coordination – comprenant l’exécution d’un certain nombre de mandats. L’objectif de ces mandats fut notamment de fournir des services centraux aux hautes écoles pouvant traiter aussi bien des aspects techniques que didactiques.<br /> <br /> Au-delà de ces objectifs définis dans le plan d’exécution, il convient d’ajouter les initiatives qui ont été prises par le Comité de pilotage et qui ont contribué à garantir le développement et la durabilité des actions entreprises dans le cadre de la phase de consolidation. Le Comité de pilotage a ainsi introduit en 2005 une procédure de monitoring des CCSP et des projets du CVS. L’idée était alors de permettre un meilleur suivi et si nécessaire un meilleur management des CCSP et des projets. Le Comité de pilotage a également soutenu un concept de « dissémination » spécifique aux projets et CCSP du CVS. Il s’agissait d’offrir aux projets et CCSP par l’intermédiaire de diverses manifestations de nouvelles perspectives pour le développement et l’exploitation de leurs produits et services eLearning. D’autres initiatives ont également été lancées par le Comité de pilotage afin de préparer la période de l’après CVS 6.<br /> <br /> == External environment ==<br /> <br /> * '''(10) What is the institution's funding from government as a percentage of annual income?'''<br /> <br /> Pour l’élaboration du „Campus Virtuel Suisse“ (CVS), la somme de 30 millions de<br /> francs a été allouée pour les années 2000 à 2003, ces subventions devant être<br /> complétées par des contributions des Hautes écoles („matching funds“) à hauteur de<br /> 50% en règle générale.<br /> <br /> Comme les subventions fédérales (rentrant dans le budget de l’OFES) sont<br /> réservées à l’encouragement de projets des universités cantonales, conformément à<br /> la loi sur l’aide aux universités (LAU), les écoles polytechniques fédérales (EPF) et<br /> les Hautes Ecoles spécialisées (HES) ont dû chercher elles-mêmes leur financement<br /> nécessaire à une participation au programme. L’Office fédéral de la formation<br /> professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT) auquel incombe la responsabilité des<br /> HES a affecté 12 millions de francs au programme CVS, qui proviennent du crédit en<br /> faveur des Hautes Ecoles Spécialisées, tandis que le Conseil des écoles<br /> polytechniques fédérales CEPF a alloué la somme de 2 millions de francs aux<br /> projets des EPF. La dotation comparativement faible des EPF pour leur participation<br /> au programme CVS s’explique en priorité par le lancement presque simultané<br /> d’initiatives, dans le même domaine, qui avaient bénéficié de fonds considérables<br /> (telles que programme-cadre „ETH World“ ou „New Learning Technologies“ NLT).<br /> <br /> Les contributions fédérales, d’un montant total à fr. 44 millions (contributions de<br /> l’OFES, l’OFFT et du CEPF additionnées), versées dans le cadre du Campus Virtuel<br /> ont permis d’encourager cinquante projets des Hautes écoles depuis le lancement du<br /> CVS, chaque projet étant développé par au moins trois partenaires académiques,<br /> conformément aux critères d’encouragement du CVS. Le programme d’impulsion<br /> CVS de 2000 à 2003 a pris fin en décembre 2003 pour être remplacé par le<br /> programme de consolidation CVS (2004 - 2007).<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(11) Describe the way that funding is provided for institutions in the institution's country, or state that it is the same as for other institutions in the country.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Le programme CVS est institutionnalisé à l’intérieur d’un cadre légal bien déterminé, la Loi fédérale sur l’aide aux universités (LAU) telle que révisée et adoptée au Parlement en octobre 1999. La LAU traduit elle-même une modification du paysage des Hautes écoles suisses marquée par un souhait plus fort de collaboration interinstitutionnelle et, en même temps, de mise en concurrence de ces institutions. Elle forme le cadre de référence à l’intérieur duquel prend forme le programme CVS et influence de manière significative son orientation et son implémentation.<br /> <br /> * '''(12) Describe the legal status of the institution.''' <br /> <br /> Not relevant because not an institution.<br /> The Swiss Virtual Campus is a '''programme''' or an '''initiative''' encouraging projects, not an institution in the strict sense.<br /> Note, the label &quot;Swiss virtual Campus&quot; is a confusing name all the more as its structure is composed of a steering committee and a coordination office, like many other Virtual Campus institutions/initiatives/consortiums.<br /> The actors in this programme are the institutions who developed projects (cooperation of 3 institutions at minimum by project).<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(13) List the language(s) that the institution uses for instruction with the percentage of students studying in each. (Bilingual study can also be included.)'''<br /> <br /> Language officially used in SVC are:<br /> * English<br /> * French<br /> * German<br /> <br /> Results impulse programme:<br /> <br /> Languages<br /> approx. 1/10: in G F E<br /> 2/5: no translations<br /> 1/10: div. languages to E<br /> 1/10: translations only into national languages<br /> <br /> * 4 projects: all in German, French and English; 10 projects: several languages without translations.<br /> * 5 projects: parts in another language; <br /> * 5 projects: German or French or Italian, with English;<br /> * 3 projects: G F; 2 projects: G F I;<br /> * 7 projects: only E; <br /> * 2 projects: only F; <br /> * 6 projects: only G.<br /> <br /> This is the repartition of native languages in the student population:<br /> 65% German, 22% French, 7% Italian, 0.4% Rätoromanisch, 0.8% English, 5% other native language<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(14) Describe any specific cultural issues that affect the institution's students or state that that it is the same as for other institutions in the country. Mention any features relevant to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Not relevant, we are talking about a country scale initiative.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(15) Describe the external quality assurance and/or accreditation regime affecting the institution, or state that it is the same as for other institutions in the country. Mention any features relevant to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Evaluation of Teaching by the Institutions: institutional evaluation of teaching is not yet dominant.<br /> * 4 projects reported on evaluations of teaching by the institution in intervals of 3 semesters to several years.<br /> * 6 projects indicated to be supported in their student enquiries by the institutional office for the evaluation of teaching or by another support office of the institution.<br /> * 14 projects indicated to evaluate their courses every time.<br /> <br /> Standards: approx. 1/10 active users<br /> * 6 projects use e-learning standards like SCORM and / or QTI (IMS)<br /> <br /> ---<br /> <br /> In general the SVC projects made considerable efforts to assure quality. Their most important concern is the enhancement of the quality of teaching. On the one hand ponderous peer reviews assured the content quality of the material, on the other hand several forms of student feedback were used to assess acceptance in the future user groups. When applying for maintenance for the SVC Consolidation Program the results of an internal project evaluation have to be presented. The projects are therefore obliged to internal quality assurance. The projects handle this obligation in different ways:<br /> <br /> * Some projects, like 991053-SWISSLING, had very intense evaluations with internal evaluation teams, often project partners. Especially the students were intensely asked on their learning experiences, but also further aspects of teaching / learning scenarios were investigated. Nearly all projects have at least started to do such internal evaluations with their students.<br /> <br /> * Another form of internal evaluation doesn’t concern the quality of the learning processes, but<br /> of the material. Peer review processes take place in all projects in which several partners<br /> use the same material. This is not always done as systematically and supported by the<br /> computer as it is done with 991017-DOIT. These processes are mostly seen as something<br /> evident, and are not even mentioned. Peer review processes are ponderous, but they<br /> contribute a lot to the acceptance of the material by the partners. Often the professors<br /> continue to use only their own material, but they are conscious of the whole spectrum of<br /> project material, and there are first attempts to use material that has been created by other<br /> persons, sometimes also in foreign projects.<br /> <br /> * The project 200114-SUPPREM is the only one to follow another strategy. There is no peer<br /> review, referring to the academic freedom of teaching. All parts of the material are available<br /> to the partners, and there is already an interest in sharing material.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(16) Describe the approach to credit transfer with other similar institutions.'''<br /> <br /> It seems accreditation was considered since the bigining as the material, courses developed must be integrated into normal cursus.<br /> <br /> Pour terminer cette vue d’ensemble de l’état de réalisation et de mise en oeuvre des<br /> projets CVS, il nous reste à décrire l’intégration des cours de e-learning développées<br /> dans d’éventuels systèmes de points de crédit.<br /> Selon les rapports de projet analysés, les produits e-learning de vingt-quatre projets<br /> CVS sont mis en oeuvre dans le cadre d’un système de points de crédit (ECTS).<br /> Celui-ci peut se présenter sous deux formes: Soit les points ECTS récompensent le<br /> fait même que les modules ou cours de e-learning ont été traités ou suivis avec<br /> succès, le cas échéant avec en complément un examen à passer en mode<br /> présentiel; soit les modules ou séquences de e-learning sont intégrés en<br /> complément à l’enseignement présentiel, en parallèle de ce dernier, et<br /> ponctuellement à titre substitutif, dans le cadre de leçons (présentielles) dotées de<br /> points ECTS. Dans ce cas, les étudiants ne doivent pas seulement fournir la preuve<br /> qu’ils ont traité les parties de e-learning, mais doivent également attester d’autres<br /> résultats pour obtenir des points ECTS. Le reporting de projet ne permet pas de<br /> déterminer exactement la forme la plus fréquente d’attribution de points ECTS pour<br /> récompenser les produits élaborés dans le cadre du CVS. Toutefois, en ce qui<br /> concerne l’intégration de ces produits dans des systèmes de crédit, il apparaît que la<br /> possibilité est offerte aux partenaires participants d’octroyer un nombre variable de<br /> crédits à une offre d’e-learning donnée d’après l’importance et le rôle de cette<br /> dernière dans un cursus particulier.<br /> <br /> Status in 2004:<br /> ECTS Points, Certificates,Exams:<br /> Approx. 1/3: more than 8 points;<br /> Approx. 1/4: between 4 and 8 points;<br /> Detailed:<br /> 15 projects offer courses summing up for more than 8 ECTS credit points (= approx. 240 working hours of students).<br /> 12 projects: between 4 and 8 credit points; 9 projects: between 1 and 4 credit points.<br /> 9 projects are not implemented or the number of credit points is 13<br /> Approx. 1/5: between 1 and 4 points.<br /> Approx. 3/10 of all projects have changed the exams and have therefore truly obligatory online parts.<br /> still open.<br /> 2 projects belong to the category “Educational Support”; therefore they do not offer any courses for regular students.<br /> 5 projects indicated the credit points for the virtual offers separately. In 14 projects the use of the online learning environment is obligatory. The other projects do the exams as before. The use of the SVC material cannot be truly obligatory there.<br /> (Basis: 47 projects)<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(17) List the main associations that the institution is a member of, with a note as to the relevance of each to e-learning (if any).'''<br /> <br /> Not relevant.<br /> SVC is not a member of any institution as SVC is a National programme.<br /> Universities participating in SVC are probably the members of several association. This should be elaborated.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(18) List the main international partners of the institution, in the order of strategic importance, with priority given to collaborations involving e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Nothing available that can proof international partnership with other institutions.<br /> <br /> == Strategy ==<br /> <br /> (Do not include annual plans.)<br /> * '''(19) Describe or provide a document describing the current institutional strategy.'''<br /> * '''(20) Describe or provide a document describing the current learning and teaching strategy.'''<br /> * '''(21) Describe or provide a document describing the current e-learning strategy.<br /> Do not include or refer to annual plans except as necessary to provide budgetary information.'''<br /> * '''(22) What is the percentage of students (a) taking courses wholly or largely delivered by e-learning (b) taking courses where the amount of institutionally supplied/guided e-learning is &quot;significant&quot; (i.e. has an impact on staff or students) and (c) taking courses where the where the amount of institutionally supplied/guided e-learning is insignificant? In each case comment on the answer.'''<br /> <br /> While the overall goals of the programme were not modified, the second phase (consolidation<br /> phase; 2004-2007) entailed a significant change in the implementation strategy, taking also into<br /> account the goal stated in the multiyear planning of Swiss universities of the Rectorʼs<br /> Conference (CRUS) to have at least 10% of the courses supported by new educational<br /> technologies.<br /> <br /> * '''(23) Give the percentage of the institutional budget that e-learning represents. Comment on how it is measured including the assumptions made, whether it is appropriate and any trends.'''<br /> <br /> considering that SFr 37 millions of federal funds were invested in the SVC<br /> impulse programme, the actual “outputs” of the programme (in terms of<br /> e-learning products) may seem to be somewhat disappointing. However, there is<br /> no ready-to-use benchmark that would help to assess the actual cost of the<br /> development and implementation of e-learning programmes in higher education,<br /> thus making it difficult to speak precisely in terms of lack of efficiency. In addition,<br /> it seems highly probable that some of the framework conditions of the programme<br /> (notably the principle of matching funds and the requirement for inter-institutional<br /> cooperation), as well as the lack of solid e-learning experience amongst project<br /> partners have raised the costs of the different projects.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(24) Categorise the role (if any) of external funding in fostering the development of e-learning as (a) not relevant, (b) useful, or (c) essential. Comment on the choice.'''<br /> <br /> (c) essential.<br /> <br /> La participation des universités<br /> au programme est subventionnée dans le cadre des contributions destinées aux projets<br /> d’innovation et de coopération selon la loi sur l’aide aux universités (LAU). Celle<br /> des écoles polytechniques fédérales (EPF) et des hautes écoles spécialisées a été<br /> soutenue respectivement, pour cette première période, par le Conseil des EPF et<br /> l’Office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie. Les hautes écoles<br /> participant aux projets ont dû également contribuer à leur financement.<br /> <br /> == Structure ==<br /> <br /> * '''(25) Describe the institutional structure, preferably supplying an organogram.'''<br /> <br /> The organisational structure of the SVC programme has been largely the same throughout its<br /> whole life (see Figure 1). The main change from the impulse to the consolidation phase has<br /> been the transfer of operational tasks to the CRUS.<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVCorga.JPG]]<br /> <br /> While the general responsibility has been attributed to the SUC – taking the formal decisions on<br /> funding of CCSP and projects -, the implementation of the programme has been assumed by a<br /> steering committee SVC-SC, composed by ten experts in the field, including two foreign<br /> experts. The SVC-SC has been responsible for evaluating the CCSP applications, for<br /> organizing the call for new projects and the selection process, for defining mandates and<br /> support services and, finally, for organising the reporting and monitoring of the activities.<br /> The programme coordination was transferred for the consolidation phase from the SUC to the<br /> CRUS, with the aim of strengthening the link of the SVC to higher education institutions.<br /> Although the programme was launched by the SUC, UAS were integrated into it both<br /> concerning the projects and the programme organization; thus, the Federal Office of<br /> Professional Education and Technology (OPET) progressively transferred all tasks, except the<br /> contracts and payments, to the SVC coordination, which was charged also with the monitoring<br /> of CCSP in UAS, of the project selection and monitoring (including financial reporting). With this aim, the OPET financed half a position in the SVC coordination, while the SVC-SC included<br /> also UAS representatives.<br /> <br /> Participation of FIT was slightly different, since both ETHZ and EPFL developed their own support centres without direct support from the SVC programme; FIT participated in some of the projects and mandates, but their degree of involvement has been lower, especially in the consolidation phase (both institutions disposed also of their own funds for educational innovation and elearning). The FIT board has always been represented in the SVC-SC. In accordance with the Federal Council’s message, the Swiss Virtual Campus is to be run by the existing Swiss University Conference and taken over by the new SUC when it commences operations.<br /> <br /> Two bodies were set up to prepare and implement the entire Programme: the SVC Commission and the SVC Steering Committee. The creation of two supervisory bodies ensures that there is close contact with universities, which is essential for the success of the Programme, and that the proposals submitted are given an impartial assessment by recognised specialists.<br /> <br /> The main responsibilities of the institutions are as follows: <br /> <br /> * '''Swiss University Conference (SUC)'''<br /> Under the agreement between the Swiss government and the university cantons on collaboration in the university field, the SUC provides project-linked funds (Art. 6 Para. 1 Item b) and thus assumes responsibility for the Programme. It approves the Implementation Plan and appoints the members of the Steering Committee and its chair upon the proposal of the CRUS. <br /> <br /> * '''Rector's Conference of the Swiss Universities (CRUS)'''<br /> The development of online courses and their integration with university curricula are eminently academic areas. Together with the opportunity to strengthen the engagement of the rectorates at the local level through the creation of competence centres, it was deemed appropriate that the operational implementation of the SVC Programme at the national level should also come under the rectorates. This approach was approved by the CRUS, to which the operational implementation was entrusted as of 1 January 2004. The programme coordination office (administration) will be attached to the CRUS for administrative purposes, in the same way as it is now under the SUC. In addition, the CRUS ensures the link between the rectorates and the Programme, a function hitherto handled by the SVC Commission, which was wound up at the end of 2003.<br /> <br /> * '''SVC Steering Committee'''<br /> The Steering Committee is responsible for implementing the Programme. Its brief is as follows: <br /> <br /> ** to carry out the Implementation Plan for 2004-2007 <br /> ** to define the qualitative criteria for project selection <br /> ** to organize submissions for projects <br /> ** to evaluate and select drafts and project applications for universities, and propose finance plans for them <br /> ** to evaluate drafts and project applications for universities of applied sciences and forward them to the OPET <br /> ** to monitor and support projects during their development phase <br /> ** to define the mandates to support the Programme and the development of projects; it can decide to place mandates up to an amount of 50,000 francs per contract <br /> ** to submit reports <br /> ** to inform the public<br /> <br /> The Steering Committee consists of 10 members, including the chair and two foreign experts. The State Secretariat for Education and Research SER (former Federal Office for Education and Science FOES), OPET, CRUS und SUC each delegate a permanent observer. Guests may be invited to take part in meetings. <br /> <br /> The Committee may set up technical groups. It submits its financial proposals to the CRUS for the attention of the SUC. <br /> <br /> * '''Coordination of the SVC Program'''<br /> The main task of the SVC coordination office (administration) is to assist the Steering Committee in the performance of its duties and in securing the link with and between university competence centres. Its other tasks include: <br /> <br /> responsibility for all matters pertaining to programme organization <br /> drafting of qualitative and financial reports <br /> budget preparation <br /> following up mandates and projects in cooperation with the Steering Committee <br /> Event organization. <br /> <br /> * '''State Secretariat for Education and Research SER''' ( former Federal Office for Education and Science FOES)<br /> The SER is responsible for credit management, auditing and reporting, and issues guidelines for this purpose.<br /> <br /> * '''Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology (OPET)''' The OPET promotes the introduction of eLearning at the Universities of Applied Sciences. The OPET is also represented in the Steering Committee SVC.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(26) Classify the e-learning support model as (a) hub (b) distributed (c) hub and spokes (d) complicated (e) non-existent. Comment on the choice.'''<br /> * '''(27) Describe in more detail the structure for the e-learning operation and how it maps into the institutional structure.'''<br /> <br /> In the institutions where the CCSPs have found stable positions, they have been mostly<br /> integrated in the central services, as a part of the vice-rectorate for education; in a number of<br /> cases, the CCSP is strongly integrated with the support service for didactics, emphasizing the<br /> fact that it is considered as an integral part of the improvement of the educational quality. Thus,<br /> SVC Final Evaluation. Background Report Lepori and Probst<br /> 24<br /> some CCSPs make a clear link with reforms of curricula as in UNISG – where elearning has<br /> been explicitly targeted to support the self-study component – and with the introduction of<br /> Bologna; many CCSPs are directly integrated in the process of reform of curricula. A special<br /> case is southern Switzerland, where the two HEIs (USI and SUPSI) have decide to join their<br /> forces in a single support centre, while in Lucerne the university has delegated the support<br /> centre to the pedagogical school.<br /> In a number of cases, the CCSP has been decentralized inside a specific faculty or institute: this<br /> reflects the existence of a specialised service at this level (like AUM in the faculty of medicine in<br /> Bern), but also the will to have units which still keep a strong link with research on educational<br /> technologies, thus avoiding a pure function of service. This is clearly the case for UNISG, EPFL<br /> and USI-SUPSI, whose CCSPs are integrated in three institutes with a strong research function<br /> in the field, cooperating together in the new doctoral programme on new media in education<br /> funded by the Swiss National Science foundation. Other CCSPs found this link with (mostly<br /> practice-oriented) research in the field through participation in networks and organization of<br /> international events (like the conference of the Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft<br /> GMW in the German-speaking universities). Some of our respondents clearly stated that the<br /> relationship to research is critical in a fast-evolving field like educational technology: it seems<br /> that developing a well-functioning CCSP in a long-term perspective entails also a difficult<br /> balance between service activities and link to research (with their different internal logics and<br /> ways of functioning).<br /> <br /> At the organizational level, roughly speaking, we can distinguish between two different models<br /> for the establishments of a CCSP:<br /> • The model of the individual centre gathering in a single unit the competences needed for<br /> elearning: this model characterizes UZH, UNIFR, USI-SUPSI, UNILU, UNISG and, among<br /> the UAS, the HSLU. In some cases, the centre also has delegates in the departments and<br /> faculties to allow for a better integration with education.<br /> • The network model where the CCSP is composed by the coordination of different units, for<br /> example a didactical centre and the informatics services; this model characterizes UNIGE,<br /> UNIBAS and UNIL and most of the UAS. This models answers better to the needs of<br /> decentralised institutions like UAS or where different centres existed already before the<br /> establishment of the CCSP.<br /> The interviews showed that both models can function well and, at the end, it is left to individual<br /> institutions to find a solution which suits their situation best, even if one has to recognize that<br /> network structures are to some extent more difficult to manage. A further concern is about the size of the centres since for some institutions it might be that a critical mass for offering different<br /> services and ensuring continuity (for example if the CCSP leader leaves) is not attained. From<br /> this perspective, our opinion is that some of the small and more decentralised structures are still<br /> rather fragile and depend on the person of the coordination itself and thus consolidation will be<br /> required in the next years.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(28) Describe the committees that oversee e-learning (including the rank and role of the Chair in each relevant committee) and their relationship to the organisational structure.'''<br /> <br /> == Learning and Teaching processes ==<br /> <br /> This has a focus on learning and teaching with other aspects viewed from this perspective.<br /> <br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching design and delivery ===<br /> <br /> * '''(29) Describe how choice of pedagogies and technologies is made for a typical programme that is envisaged to include significant e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Pedagogical Consulting and Support<br /> approx. 1/5: individually organised pedagogical support<br /> <br /> At least 15 projects had a pedagogue as a partner or as a team member. At least 4 projects engaged external experts (e.g. independent consultants) for external evaluation and consulting.<br /> Many projects mentioned the support centres of the institutions. 8 projects mentioned explicitely to have had positive experiences with IntersTICES, 11 projects with eQuality.<br /> <br /> * '''(30) Describe what scope staff have at delivery stage to refine or in some cases override design decisions made earlier.'''<br /> <br /> Design Rules for the Material<br /> approx. 1/5 had a clearly defined concept<br /> <br /> 15 projects indicated to have developed exact guidelines for the<br /> design of the material. For 3 projects this wasn’t relevant because<br /> design was done independently by one single person.<br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching development ===<br /> <br /> <br /> This includes materials and IPR.<br /> <br /> * '''(31) How much e-learning content is sourced from outside the institution? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment (an exact percentage is useful).'''<br /> <br /> The new forms of cooperation are manifold. Very rare up to now is the sharing of courses, of<br /> students and of teaching material. First the teaching material has to be developed and finished<br /> solidly. Up to now the effort of finishing the development of content material despite delays and exaggerated plans has rather slowed down further cooperation initiatives that would presuppose such material.<br /> <br /> Many plans for cooperation fail because of the orientation of the material in the content details. Something that seems to fit may well go too much into detail and be too specialised at a closer look. Usually the material is not yet structured systematically into a general and a specialised part in order to make parts of it usable in other contexts. There is still the problem of examples, anyway. They reach their aim only if they are likely to rise interest and to convince. Unusual examples from foreign domains can restrain the learning success.<br /> <br /> Fostering the sharing of online material is tightly linked with technical, legal, pedagogical, social and psychological questions; it is a complex domain.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(32) Of all e-learning content sourced from outside the institution, what fraction is OER? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(33) When staff in the institution develop content, is the content (a) owned by them and licensed to the institution, (b) owned by the institution but with some licensing back to staff, (c) owned by the institution but with no licensing back to staff, (d) unclear or disputed IPR position? Whatever option is chosen, provide a narrative describing the situation in more detail.'''<br /> <br /> Most projects have plans for further cooperations, but no new users yet. Sharing fails for instance because a project has received the right to use a software free of charge, and it would cost for the new partner. Or because copyright questions aren’t clarified enough to take the risk to let a larger target public use the material; they fear lawsuits. Or because they don’t trust the quality of their own material and want to make further reviews.<br /> <br /> * '''(34) When content is sourced for a programme within the institution, how much is sourced from other departments within the institution? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment (an exact percentage is useful).'''<br /> <br /> * '''(35) What is the role of student-generated content in the institution's programmes? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching evaluation and quality ===<br /> <br /> * '''(36) Describe the quality procedures (a) in general terms and (b) with respect to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Student Questionnaires regularly in regular courses.<br /> All projects did at least tests with single students. 35 projects indicated to have done student enquiries in regular courses.<br /> <br /> * '''(37) Describe the approach to evaluation of programmes (a) in general terms and (b) where such programmes have significant e-learning components.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> * Evaluation of the impulse programme (2000-2003)<br /> <br /> Au début du mois de janvier 2003, la Conférence Universitaire Suisse (CUS) a donné<br /> mandat au Centre de formation continue de l’Université de Berne (KWB) d’évaluer le<br /> programme d’impulsion „Campus Virtuel Suisse“ (CVS). Pour l’exécution de ce<br /> mandat, le KWB a travaillé en coopération avec l’Observatoire Science, Politique et<br /> Société (OSPS) de l’EPF de Lausanne, tout en assumant la responsabilité du projet.<br /> <br /> <br /> A set of questions were used to structure the evaluation which took place over a<br /> period of sixteen months:<br /> <br /> • What are the visions, the goals and objectives of the SVC programme according to<br /> its principal stakeholders? What are its expected effects and impacts?<br /> <br /> • How do different stakeholders assess the relevance and coherence of the<br /> programme? How well do the objectives of the SVC reflect the structural and<br /> strategic needs and interests of the institutions concerned?<br /> <br /> • What promotion strategies were adopted? What kind of projects were promoted?<br /> <br /> • How are the implementation and management of the programme to be judged?<br /> What procedures and rules governed the realisation processes of the SVC and its<br /> projects? How well did they function?<br /> <br /> • What are the most significant results, effects and impacts of the SVC programme?<br /> How well has the SVC programme met its objectives?<br /> <br /> • How are SVC project results used? How well are they integrated in the curricula of<br /> participating institutions?<br /> <br /> <br /> To address these evaluation questions the following methods and procedures have<br /> been applied:<br /> <br /> • Analysis of SVC documents and online materials, as for example, SVC<br /> execution plan, calls for proposals series 1 and 2, project proposals, project<br /> reports, reports on e-site visits, websites of SVC and its projects etc.;<br /> <br /> • Semi-structured interviews with 48 key persons and stakeholders of SVC<br /> (members of the SVC Steering Committee, the SVC Commission, representatives<br /> of the SUC, the federal offices concerned and of participating institutions);<br /> <br /> • E-mail questionnaire to project leaders and coordinators (response rate: 50%);<br /> <br /> • Review of the 2003 project reporting (24 intermediary and 13 final reports);<br /> <br /> • Review of the 15 project submissions for maintenance support.<br /> <br /> Consolidation programme:<br /> <br /> Evaluation of SVC is being carried out by Professor [[Robin Mason]] of the UK [[Open University]]. This phase starts with a meeting in April 2008 and continues with interviews of key officials and stakeholders in June 2008. An evaluation report is available and have information of interest:<br /> <br /> == Meta Learning and Teaching processes ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Communications ===<br /> <br /> * '''(38) Describe how the institution communicates good practice in e-learning within itself, focussing on communications across internal boundaries.'''<br /> * ('''39) Describe how the institution communicates its good practice in e-learning to organisations outside.'''<br /> <br /> Cette démarche s’inscrit dans la politique de dissémination poursuivie par le CVS tout au<br /> long des années 2004-2008. Il s’agit ainsi d’offrir à l’ensemble des produits et services<br /> eLearning une plateforme supplémentaire d’échanges et d’informations leur permettant<br /> de se faire connaître au sein de la communauté eLearning suisse et au-delà et de donner<br /> lieu dans un second temps à d’éventuelles collaborations.<br /> <br /> * &quot;Campus Virtuel Suisse Phase de consolidation – 2004-2008 CCSP, projets et mandats Tour d’horizon&quot;. L’objectif de la brochure est de présenter l’ensemble des produits et services qui ont été développés au cours de la phase de consolidation du programme fédéral du Campus Virtuel Suisse (CVS).<br /> * Elle fait suite à la première publication du CVS intitulée « Les premiers 50 projets – 2000-<br /> 2003 »1.<br /> <br /> Les deux brochures permettant alors de couvrir l’ensemble de la période du CVS.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(40) Describe how the institution communicates good practice in e-learning from outside organisations into its own organisation.'''<br /> * '''(41) Describe recent occasions on which institutional leaders or managers have made presentations with significant reference to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> === Value for money ===<br /> <br /> * '''(42) Describe the annual planning procedure (a) in general and (b) how it handles e-learning aspects.'''<br /> * '''(43) Describe the decision-making process for a typical academic programme, with particular reference to how e-learning aspects are handled.'''<br /> * '''(44) Describe the decision-making process for a typical large IT project such as selection and installation of a new VLE.'''<br /> * '''(45) Describe the approach to budget management with particular reference to the staff versus non-staff issues in budgeting for e-learning.'''<br /> * '''(46) Describe the procedures in the institution for assigning or negotiating teaching workload to/with staff, taking account of non-traditional styles of teaching as well as classroom teaching and taking specific account of e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Staff ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Teachers, lecturers, trainers and equivalent support roles ===<br /> <br /> * '''(47) Describe the approach to development of e-learning technical and pedagogic skills among staff, taking account of the different needs of different categories of staff. Set this within the context of staff development generally.'''<br /> <br /> Technical consulting and support more than 1/2 individual<br /> * 8 projects indicated Edutech as an important consultant and support. 9 projects referred to support structures of their institution.<br /> * 7 projects didn’t need technical support because of their own competencies. <br /> * 11 projects indicated to have profited from the SVC mandate Edutech (http://www.edutech.ch).<br /> <br /> * '''(48) Describe (a) the current level of staff competence in e-learning and (b) the expected level of staff competence in five years time. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(49) Describe the extent to which staff attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(50) Describe the way that the institution rewards and recognises staff with competence in e-learning, in (a) monetary and (b) non-monetary terms.'''<br /> <br /> === Management and leadership ===<br /> <br /> This subsection concerns leaders (Rectors, Vice-Chancellors, etc) and academic and support service managers (Deans, Directors, etc). These do not need to have specific knowledge of e-learning details but must have the necessary strategic, management, costing and foresight capability to preside over decisions on key e-learning issues such as procurement of a new VLE, development of a new distance learning programme, rebalancing the library and its staff more towards web 2.0 and less to books, etc. This will require appropriate manager and leader training.<br /> * '''(51) Describe the approach to development of e-learning-related skills among (a) managers and (b) leaders.'''<br /> * '''(52) Describe the current level of (a) management and (b) leadership competence in e-learning related skills appropriate to their levels. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(53) describe the extent to which (a) management and (b) leadership attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(54) Give details of the job description of the most senior manager/leader in the organisation who spends a significant portion of his/her time on e-learning matters (e.g. the Director of E-Learning).'''<br /> <br /> == Students ==<br /> <br /> Contributions to the Project from Students:<br /> 10 projects have integrated contributions from students into project material.<br /> <br /> * '''(55) Describe the approach to development of e-learning skills among students, taking account of the different needs of different categories of students. Set this within the context of students' more general information literacy and communication skills.'''<br /> <br /> ** 72 % understand quickly how to learn with the virtual learning offering.<br /> ** 26% rate the item negatively or are undecided.<br /> <br /> ** 63% of the students estimate that their learning processes are supported by the virtual learning offering. <br /> ** 36 % rate the item negatively or are undecided.<br /> <br /> * '''(56) Describe (a) the current level of student competence in e-learning on entry to the institution and (b) the expected level of student competence on graduation from the institution. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> A line is writen in the report for this purpose. But the matching information cell is empty. ???<br /> <br /> * '''(57) Describe the extent to which student attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> The small number of statements on learning with virtual learning offerings could mean that students are open and do accept the implementation of eLearning.<br /> <br /> * '''(58) Describe the extent to which students understand the demands on them placed by e-learning systems (e.g. for assignment handling).'''<br /> <br /> 72% consider the learning goals to be stated clearly. 18% are indecisive or consider the learning goals as unclear.<br /> <br /> * '''(59) Describe the current approach to handling student plagiarism, both prevention strategies and detection strategies.'''<br /> * '''(60) Describe the current (i.e. at last survey) level of student satisfaction with the e-learning aspects of their courses. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> 60% consider the learning offering as appropriate to achieve the declared learning goals. 35% are undecided or disagree.<br /> <br /> == Technology ==<br /> <br /> '''(61) For each of the following technologies relevant to e-learning describe how much it is used on a scale of 1-5 and add a comment if appropriate.'''<br /> <br /> [[Edutech]] was in charge to provide support to SVC with technological matters.<br /> <br /> <br /> * VLE and/or content repository<br /> <br /> Plate-forme nationale (WebCT Vista) auprès de SWITCH: Comme une bonne<br /> partie des projets CVS est destinée au WebCT, une plate-forme nationale WebCT<br /> Vista a été créée auprès de SWITCH sur mandat du CVS. Celle-ci compte mille<br /> „seats“ dans un premier temps, disponibles pour les projets CVS correspondants.<br /> En fonction des résultats de cette première plate-forme, une sera, possiblement,<br /> ouverte.<br /> <br /> * email or bulletin boards<br /> ** Course e-Mail<br /> ** Discussion-Forum<br /> * automated assessment<br /> * Web 2.0 tools especially blogs, wikis and social networks oriented to the institution<br /> ** textbooks<br /> ** Collaboration : 12% use the virtual offerings for collaboration and 15% only partly<br /> * e-portfolios<br /> * laptops - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> * audio or video podcasting or streaming - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> * mobile devices (not laptops) - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> And finally:<br /> * Provide a description of any other technologies with significant use in the institution.<br /> <br /> ** Flash Notes: Flash Support for SVC Projects<br /> ** 19 projects have developed software.<br /> <br /> == Futures ==<br /> <br /> A la demande du président du Comité de pilotage du Campus Virtuel Suisse (CVS), nous vous transmettons quelques informations sur la situation et l'état actuel de la négotiation concernant la réalisation d'un &quot;service national de plateforme&quot;:<br /> <br /> Le Comité de pilotage du CVS a soumis à la Conférence Générale (Conférence des Recteurs des Universités Suisses CRUS, Conférence Suisse des Hautes Écoles Spécialisées CSHES, Conférence Suisse des Recteurs des Hautes Écoles Pédagogiques CSHEP) la proposition qu'un service national de plateforme soit offert par SWITCH à partir de janvier 2008. Il est prévu que la plateforme WebCT Vista et une plateforme en logiciel libre soient hébergées. Une répartition du financement entre des contributions fédérales fixes et des frais d' exploitation variables en fonction du nombre d'utilisateurs doit permettre une utilisation peu onéreuse de l'offre. <br /> La CRUS, la CSHES et la CSHEP plaident pour la mise en place d'un service national de plateforme à partir de 2007 et recommandent à SWITCH de négocier avec le Comité de Pilotage du CVS pour réaliser l'hébergement et l'opérationnalisation des plateformes correspondantes. <br /> Le Comité de pilotage du CVS dispose de licences auprès de WebCT Vista jusqu'à la fin 2007 et négocie pour le moment avec SWITCH pour l'acquisition de licences à vie. <br /> Les négociations doivent être conclues entre WebCT, SWITCH et le Secrétariat d’Etat à l'éducation et à la recherche SER. La Conférence universitaire suisse CUS doit approuver formellement la décision. Nous espérons qu'une décision sera encore possible cette année. <br /> La fusion de WebCT et de Blackboard a peu d'influence sur le service de plateforme à court et à moyen terme. A long terme, une modification concernant les produits software est possible.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(62) Describe the expected changes as they relate to e-learning within the institution's current strategic horizon (from the institution's strategy documents).'''<br /> * '''(63) Describe any changes further downstream that the institution is now considering or concerned about.'''<br /> * '''(64) Describe how the institution handles the foresight aspects of its operation with regard to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> '''After the Swiss Virtual Campus'''<br /> <br /> Already at the beginning of the consolidation phase it had been determined that the costs for funding eLearning projects should gradually be integrated into the normal budgets at the institutes for higher education. The Rectors’ Conference of the Swiss Universities (CRUS) confirmed this plan in September 2007 and emphasised that in the future the development of eLearning as an inherent component of teaching would lie in the sole responsibility of the institutes for higher education.<br /> With this in mind, all stakeholders have prepared for the transition and the handing over of projects to the two major stakeholders: the centres of competence, service and production (CCSPs) and the foundation SWITCH, both of which will offer a package of central services for the teaching staff after the SVC phase.<br /> <br /> '''CCSPs'''<br /> The centres of competence, service and production (CCSPs) at the various institutes of<br /> higher education have been implemented or strengthened in the SVC’s consolidation<br /> phase and will essentially continue to function in the post-SVC phase and promote the<br /> development and the use of educational technology. Although the size and organisational<br /> structure of the CCSPs may vary among the different institutes of higher education,<br /> the services they offer can be classified into two major categories: support in didactic or<br /> technical questions as regards implementing eLearning tools, and support for the executive<br /> boards at the institutes of higher education regarding the strategic integration of<br /> new educational technology to improve the quality of academic teaching.<br /> <br /> '''SWITCH'''<br /> SWITCH has always been a preferred contact of the SVC. Particularly within the framework<br /> of the mandates assigned by the steering committee of the SVC, SWITCH has developed a<br /> broad range of services for the eLearning community. Over the course of time, this collaboration<br /> has evolved into the «eduhub»8 concept, first initiated by the SVC and consequently<br /> elaborated and implemented by SWITCH. This concept enables SWITCH to regularly offer<br /> the Swiss eLearning community an entire package of activities and central services9.<br /> One of the more important activities was setting up the «Educational Technology Working<br /> Group» which provides a platform for various representatives of the CCSPs and the<br /> stakeholders who are responsible for new educational technology at the institutes of<br /> higher education. The working group aims to promote educational technology in academic<br /> education in Switzerland by cooperating mainly on a national level. Other goals<br /> include political lobbying and international networking.<br /> <br /> '''Teaching staff'''<br /> However, beyond establishing the central services that are now available, it is obvious that<br /> the success of eLearning in the post-SVC phase and in the coming years will also depend<br /> on teachers and lecturers, their enthusiasm and commitment, and their conviction of the<br /> benefit of new educational technology.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(65) Describe how the institution handles advanced development oriented to e-learning (e.g. by a &quot;sandbox&quot; lab, innovation centre, etc).'''<br /> * '''(66) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account present and future markets for its offerings.'''<br /> <br /> A big challenge for the next few years will be to use, maintain and disseminate these results without direct federal funding within ordinary teaching assignments and supported by the existing service units within institutions of higher education (IHE). The use of existing material for further users should be profitable for the projects.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(67) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account present and future competitor suppliers for its offerings.'''<br /> * '''(68) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account the views of other stakeholders, including but not restricted to employers, local authorities and the social partners (unions).'''<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Finally have a section for References etc--&gt;<br /> <br /> == References and reports ==<br /> <br /> ''Add what you can''.<br /> <br /> '''Impluse phase:'''<br /> <br /> * Evaluation report of the impulse programme (2000-2003)<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/evaluation/Impulsprogramm_fr_total.pdf (French version with summary in English)<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/evaluation/Impulsprogramm_dt_total.pdf (German version)<br /> <br /> * Documentation &quot;The Swiss Virtual Campus and the Swiss Universities&quot; for the pavillon at the exposition Learntec 2003 <br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_E.pdf (English version)<br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_D.pdf (German version)<br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_F.pdf (French version)<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Consolidation phase:'''<br /> <br /> * Execution plan 2004 – 2007 - French version<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/svc_cp/Execution_Plan_f.pdf<br /> <br /> * Execution plan 2004 - 2007 - German version<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/svc_cp/Execution_Plan_d.pdf<br /> <br /> Swiss Virtual Campus - Consolidation Phase – 2004-2008 - CCSPs, projects and mandates Overview<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-En.pdf (English version)<br /> <br /> Campus Virtuel Suisse - 2004-2008 - CCSP, projets et mandats - Tour d'horizon <br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-Fr.pdf (French version)<br /> <br /> Konsolidierungsphase - 2004-2008 - CCSP, Projekte und Mandate - Überblick<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-De.pdf (German version)<br /> <br /> Swiss Virtual Campus Status Report 2004 Consolidated Results of the Mandate “SVC Status Reports and Project Monitoring” concerning the Projects of the Impulse Program 2000−2003<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/mandates/SVC%20Mandate%20Status%20Reports.pdf<br /> <br /> * Evaluation Campus Virtuel Suisse - Programme de consolidation (en Français, Allemand et Anglais)<br /> <br /> http://www.cus.ch/wDeutsch/publikationen/SVC/SVC-Evaluationsbericht-2004-07-online.pdf<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> [[SVC- Lessons learned - impulse programme]]<br /> <br /> [[SVC- Lessons learned - consolidation programme]]<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Swiss Virtual Campus - Case study (F)]]<br /> [[Swiss Virtual Campus - Case study (D)]]<br /> <br /> ----<br /> &gt; [[Switzerland]]<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> &gt; [[Programmes]]<br /> <br /> &gt;&gt; '''[[Case studies]]'''<br /> <br /> [[Category:Switzerland]]<br /> [[Category:Case studies]]<br /> [[Category:Case study for ULP]]</div>

DroneLtvid http://openeducation.wiki/w/index.php?title=Swiss_Virtual_Campus_-_Case_study_(F)&diff=18518 2009-09-02T05:08:58Z

<p>DroneLtvid: </p> <hr /> <div>* [http://basc4tdomlad.com/getacou.html delcacelvi]<br /> http://racroeltcna.com/lidronlit.html[delcacelvi] [[http://racroeltcna.com/lidronlit.html][delcacelvi]]<br /> * http://vicnadomrotr.com/oubasmonget.html delcacelvi<br /> * [[http://racracgetou.com/lavibolivimo.html delcacelvi]]<br /> * [[http://zelpasc4t.com/domdronnocad.html|delcacelvi]]<br /> * [[http://relroc.com/rolergett.html | delcacelvi]]<br /> * [http://caoudel.com/eltvarbas.html|delcacelvi]<br /> * [delcacelvi|http://virodarol.com/accoc4ta.html]<br /> * ((http://lisitmonze.com/bositac.html delcacelvi))<br /> * [delcacelvi](http://montatrno.com/varchil.html &quot;delcacelvi&quot;)<br /> &quot;delcacelvi&quot;:http://boerolotr.com/zelsitze.html<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- This is the template for &quot;case study&quot; entries --&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Start with a very brief overview as for mini case studies - Programmes --&gt;<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVC logo.JPG ||right|250px|SVC logo]]<br /> Le programme [[Campus Virtuel Suisse]] (Campus Virtuale Svizzera, Swiss Virtual Campus, Virtueller Campus Schweiz, ABBREV: [[SVC]]) encourage la formation supérieure via l'internet au sein des hautes écoles suisses (universités, hautes écoles spécialisées, écoles polytechniques fédérales). Les étudiant-e-s ne sont ainsi plus liés à un programme de cours strict mais peuvent acquérir un savoir à toute heure et en tout lieu.<br /> <br /> Le programme CVS a été lancé en 1999 sur proposition de la CUS et de sa commission de planification afin de promouvoir lʼutilisation des nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication dans les hautes écoles suisses. Outre cet objectif général, ce programme mettait la priorité sur la création dʼunités dʼenseignement disponibles sur Internet qui pourraient être utilisées par les étudiants de différentes institutions et qui pourraient être reconnues dans leurs cursus.<br /> <br /> Les objectifs globaux de politique générale, tels quʼénoncés dans le Message du Conseil fédéral pour lʼencouragement de la formation, de la recherche et de la technologie pendant les années 2000–2003, consistaient à encourager la coopération entre les hautes écoles afin de promouvoir lʼinnovation dans les méthodes pédagogiques et de produire du matériel de formation de haute qualité. Ce programme faisait partie des activités gérées par la CUS en vertu de la Loi fédérale sur lʼaide aux universités (LAU) afin dʼencourager la coopération et la modernisation du système suisse dʼéducation supérieure.<br /> <br /> Si les objectifs globaux du programme nʼont pas été modifiés, la seconde phase (phase de consolidation; 2004-2007) a toutefois donné lieu à des changements significatifs dans la <br /> stratégie de mise en oeuvre du projet, en prenant également en compte lʼobjectif formulé dans la planification pluriannuelle de la Conférence des Recteurs des Universités Suisses (CRUS), à savoir parvenir à au moins 10% de cours assistés par les nouvelles technologies dʼenseignement. En outre, puisquʼil était prévisible que le programme fédéral prendrait fin (peut-être avec une troisième période de cessation progressive), lʼun des objectifs généraux du programme de consolidation était que les hautes écoles elles-mêmes assument la responsabilité du développement du e-learning.<br /> <br /> Ces objectifs généraux ont débouché sur un objectif plus précis: développer un Centre de compétence, de service et de production (CCSP) dans chaque haute école suisse. Ces centres devaient consister en des équipes professionnelles dotées des compétences technologiques et <br /> pédagogiques requises pour élaborer des cours en e-learning, avec deux avantages principaux: <br /> 1) assurer lʼaccumulation à long terme de compétences et dʼexpériences dans ce domaine, donc au-delà de lʼobjectif des projets individuels;<br /> 2) réduire les coûts de développement grâce aux effets dʼéconomies dʼéchelle et transférer ces expériences dʼun projet à lʼautre. En outre, ces centres devaient permettre une meilleure intégration des projets CVS à la stratégie universitaire globale. Un financement supplémentaire a également été alloué à des projets préexistants afin dʼaider à les maintenir et à les intégrer au sein des universités participantes.<br /> <br /> Enfin, deux appels à propositions pour de nouveaux projets ont été lancés en 2004 et 2005. Si<br /> les principes généraux étaient les mêmes que durant la phase d'impulsion, lʼapproche de lʼenseignement mixte (blended learning) était officiellement avalisée dans lʼappel à propositions, tandis que le CCSP de la leading house était simultanément chargé de produire les modules de e-learning en collaboration avec le chef de projet.<br /> <br /> <br /> 82 cours en ligne ont déjà été développés dans les disciplines les plus diverses. 30 autres cours de la 4ème et dernière série sont en développement.<br /> <br /> Le site web du Campus Virtuel Suisse: http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVC network.JPG|thumb|right|400px|SCV cooperation network]]<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Say something brief about its mission etc. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- Say something brief about the teaching methods, number of students, staff etc. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- Say something about membership of international organisations if relevant. --&gt;<br /> &lt;!-- That completes the stub. Now follows the 10 sections of the Case study format. --&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> == Institution ==<br /> <br /> === The present ===<br /> <br /> * '''(1) Provide a general description of the institution in its current state, putting the e-learning into context'''.<br /> <br /> The Swiss Virtual Campus programme ended on July 31st, 2008. <br /> No head and coordination is active at the moment.<br /> The local centers are continuing to do use the virtual content.<br /> Last update of SVC website : May 08, 2007.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(2) What is the institution's annual budget?'''<br /> <br /> Des 44 millions de francs de contributions fédérales alloués au CVS (fonds de<br /> l‘OFES, de l‘OFFT et du Conseil EPF réunis), 37 millions ont été affectés à<br /> l‘encouragement de projet du CVS. Ces montants ont été complétés par les<br /> „matching funds“ exigés des responsables de projet, atteignant un volume de<br /> financement similaire. On peut ainsi admettre que le volume total maximal des<br /> projets CVS oscillait entre 70 et 75 millions de francs.<br /> <br /> * '''(3) How many students does the institution have (a) in total? (b) as full-time equivalents?'''<br /> <br /> Number of Students in 2004 approx. 4/5 from cantonal universities; approx. 1/10 from<br /> the ETH domain; approx. 1/8 from UAS<br /> <br /> * approx. 9’800 students at cantonal Universities (from 35 projects);<br /> * approx. 1’300 students at the ETHZ / EPFL (from 9 projects);<br /> * approx. 1’400 students at Universities of Applied Sciences (from 14 projects); <br /> * totally approx. 12'500 SVC students at Swiss Institutions of Higher Education; but this number is hardly reached every semester. <br /> 33 project teams indicate to have regularly more than 100 students. 27 of these projects started with regular courses in 2003 or before.<br /> <br /> * '''(4) How many staff does the institution have (a) in total? (b) as full-time equivalents?'''<br /> <br /> Approx. 1020 names of persons having worked for the SVC were indicated up to now (the data from one project are missing).<br /> <br /> Person-years invested: average: approx. 12 personyears per project; approx. 2/5 financed by the SVC.<br /> Totally at least approx. 600 person-years were invested into SVC projects. Before the start of the projects approx. 44 person-years were already invested into the themes of the projects; the SVC financed at least approx. 253 person-years (from one project the data are missing).<br /> <br /> * '''(5) What is the institution's &quot;business model&quot;? (a) public (b) private (c) consortium (d) national programme. If (c) or (d) above, list the other partners (or the members) and for each briefly describe its role.'''<br /> * '''(6) What percentage of the institution's students are based outside the home country?'''<br /> * '''(7) Describe the institution's approach to virtual mobility.'''<br /> <br /> Considering the official goals and objectives of the SVC programme as they<br /> were set in the Federal Message of 1998 and in the two calls for proposals, the<br /> degree to which the SVC programme has met its objectives is clearly limited. In<br /> particular, the objectives to “set up a virtual campus” or to “develop a substantial<br /> offer in distance-learning” have not been met. These objectives have not found<br /> strong support amongst the majority of the stakeholders, and this may explain why<br /> so few of the SVC projects were aimed at developing distance-learning<br /> programmes. As a result, the SVC programme has not been as successful as<br /> expected promoting real virtual mobility among the student population.<br /> <br /> Percentage of Self Study or Distance Learning<br /> 1/4 for each group:<br /> 1. below or near 50%;<br /> 2. between 50% and 80%;<br /> 3. 80% or more;<br /> 4. depends on the course<br /> <br /> details:<br /> * 2 projects: below 20% ; 6 projects: between 20% and 50%;<br /> * 4 projects: near 50%;<br /> * 12 projects: between 50% and 80%;<br /> * 12 projects: 80% or more. 29 projects could offer more than 80% of distance learning if they wanted it.<br /> 11 projects vary from one extreme to the other, according to the course.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(8) Describe how the institution manages its &quot;brand&quot; (a) in general and (b) in respect of any e-learning aspects.'''<br /> <br /> La taille du projet et lʼampleur de son financement ont inévitablement attiré lʼattention et ont donné un profil plus visible au e-learning.<br /> <br /> === The past ===<br /> <br /> * '''(9) Give a narrative description of the institution's history since its foundation, concentrating on key dates, recent years and any e-learning issues.'''<br /> <br /> * Impulse federal programme 2000–2003<br /> <br /> Le 8 octobre 1999, le Parlement a approuvé le Message présenté par le Conseil<br /> fédéral relatif à l’encouragement de la formation, de la recherche et de la technologie<br /> pour les années 2000 - 2003 (Message FRT 2000-2003) et ainsi accepté le crédit<br /> demandé dans le même temps en faveur d’un programme fédéral échelonné sur<br /> quatre ans et s’intitulant „Encouragement des nouvelles technologies de l’information<br /> et de la communication (NTIC) dans une perspective d’élaboration d’un „Campus<br /> Virtuel Suisse“ 3 .<br /> <br /> The federal programme “Swiss Virtual Campus” (SVC) was launched in October<br /> 1999 as part of an overall process of promoting the “Swiss information society” in<br /> general and, in particular, the use of the new information and communication<br /> technologies (ICT) in higher education. <br /> <br /> Over a period of 4 years (2000 - 2003) and with a sum of approximately SFr. 44 million in federal funds, the SVC programme subsidised projects for the development of virtual teaching and/or learning courses (e-learning courses) by Swiss Universities, Universities of Applied Science and the Federal Institutes of Technology. In order to receive support projects had to be<br /> developed by the cooperation of at least three academic partners and had to focus<br /> on innovations in tertiary teaching “in that they involve complete courses that can be<br /> followed independently via the Internet”.<br /> <br /> In January 2003 the Swiss University Conference (SUC) commissioned an overall<br /> evaluation of the SVC programme. This summative evaluation was intended to<br /> analyze the implementation processes, the outputs and the (potential) impacts of<br /> the SVC programme, considering the objectives set for the programme as well as<br /> the context of the programme.<br /> <br /> goal: 50 e-learning projects must be developed<br /> 2004 : half of the projects were developed.<br /> Ces cinquante<br /> projets du programme ont été sélectionnés et lancés en deux temps. Vingt-huit<br /> projets ont été démarrés lors de la première série, dans le courant de l’été 2000, et<br /> dans la deuxième série du début de l’année 2001, vingt-deux autres projets ont été<br /> autorisés.<br /> <br /> <br /> Tableau n°1: Projets CVS par domaine de connaissances<br /> Domaine de connaissances Nombre de projets<br /> * Sciences de l’art et sciences humaines 7 projets<br /> * Sciences naturelles / Sciences de la vie 9 projets<br /> * Ingénierie, mathématiques, informatique 9 projets<br /> * Economie d’entreprise et gestion financière 6 projets<br /> * Sciences économiques et droit 4 projets<br /> * Médecine 11 projets<br /> * Support éducationnel 4 projets<br /> <br /> <br /> Phase de consolidation<br /> <br /> La phase de consolidation reprend en partie les objectifs de la phase d’impulsion4 en les adaptant et en les enrichissant de l’expérience acquise et du nouveau contexte des hautes écoles et se définit autour de quatre axes majeurs d’intervention5 :<br /> * la création ou la consolidation de Centres de Compétence, de Service et de Production (CCSP) dans chaque haute école : l’idée a été d’assurer l’existence d’une équipe de production au sein de chaque haute école suisse ayant pour rôle de soutenir le développement de nouveaux cours en ligne et la maintenance des cours développés.<br /> * l’utilisation et la maintenance des projets déjà développés : un financement supplémentaire a été accordé aux projets développés au cours de la phase d’impulsion et dont la qualité a été reconnue afin d’en garantir l’utilisation et la pleine intégration dans les cursus;<br /> * le développement de nouveaux cours : au cours de la phase de consolidation, deux appels à projets ont été lancés. Au total, 64 projets ont été développés et soutenus dans le cadre du CVS répartis de la façon suivante : 32 projets pour la 3ème série – auxquels s’ajoutent 2 projets de l’Office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT) qui ont été suivis administrativement par la coordination du CVS mais n’ont pas reçu le label « CVS » – et 30 projets pour la 4ème série.<br /> * la poursuite des services destinés aux hautes écoles et la coordination – comprenant l’exécution d’un certain nombre de mandats. L’objectif de ces mandats fut notamment de fournir des services centraux aux hautes écoles pouvant traiter aussi bien des aspects techniques que didactiques.<br /> <br /> Au-delà de ces objectifs définis dans le plan d’exécution, il convient d’ajouter les initiatives qui ont été prises par le Comité de pilotage et qui ont contribué à garantir le développement et la durabilité des actions entreprises dans le cadre de la phase de consolidation. Le Comité de pilotage a ainsi introduit en 2005 une procédure de monitoring des CCSP et des projets du CVS. L’idée était alors de permettre un meilleur suivi et si nécessaire un meilleur management des CCSP et des projets. Le Comité de pilotage a également soutenu un concept de « dissémination » spécifique aux projets et CCSP du CVS. Il s’agissait d’offrir aux projets et CCSP par l’intermédiaire de diverses manifestations de nouvelles perspectives pour le développement et l’exploitation de leurs produits et services eLearning. D’autres initiatives ont également été lancées par le Comité de pilotage afin de préparer la période de l’après CVS 6.<br /> <br /> == External environment ==<br /> <br /> * '''(10) What is the institution's funding from government as a percentage of annual income?'''<br /> <br /> Pour l’élaboration du „Campus Virtuel Suisse“ (CVS), la somme de 30 millions de<br /> francs a été allouée pour les années 2000 à 2003, ces subventions devant être<br /> complétées par des contributions des Hautes écoles („matching funds“) à hauteur de<br /> 50% en règle générale.<br /> <br /> Comme les subventions fédérales (rentrant dans le budget de l’OFES) sont<br /> réservées à l’encouragement de projets des universités cantonales, conformément à<br /> la loi sur l’aide aux universités (LAU), les écoles polytechniques fédérales (EPF) et<br /> les Hautes Ecoles spécialisées (HES) ont dû chercher elles-mêmes leur financement<br /> nécessaire à une participation au programme. L’Office fédéral de la formation<br /> professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT) auquel incombe la responsabilité des<br /> HES a affecté 12 millions de francs au programme CVS, qui proviennent du crédit en<br /> faveur des Hautes Ecoles Spécialisées, tandis que le Conseil des écoles<br /> polytechniques fédérales CEPF a alloué la somme de 2 millions de francs aux<br /> projets des EPF. La dotation comparativement faible des EPF pour leur participation<br /> au programme CVS s’explique en priorité par le lancement presque simultané<br /> d’initiatives, dans le même domaine, qui avaient bénéficié de fonds considérables<br /> (telles que programme-cadre „ETH World“ ou „New Learning Technologies“ NLT).<br /> <br /> Les contributions fédérales, d’un montant total à fr. 44 millions (contributions de<br /> l’OFES, l’OFFT et du CEPF additionnées), versées dans le cadre du Campus Virtuel<br /> ont permis d’encourager cinquante projets des Hautes écoles depuis le lancement du<br /> CVS, chaque projet étant développé par au moins trois partenaires académiques,<br /> conformément aux critères d’encouragement du CVS. Le programme d’impulsion<br /> CVS de 2000 à 2003 a pris fin en décembre 2003 pour être remplacé par le<br /> programme de consolidation CVS (2004 - 2007).<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(11) Describe the way that funding is provided for institutions in the institution's country, or state that it is the same as for other institutions in the country.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Le programme CVS est institutionnalisé à l’intérieur d’un cadre légal bien déterminé, la Loi fédérale sur l’aide aux universités (LAU) telle que révisée et adoptée au Parlement en octobre 1999. La LAU traduit elle-même une modification du paysage des Hautes écoles suisses marquée par un souhait plus fort de collaboration interinstitutionnelle et, en même temps, de mise en concurrence de ces institutions. Elle forme le cadre de référence à l’intérieur duquel prend forme le programme CVS et influence de manière significative son orientation et son implémentation.<br /> <br /> * '''(12) Describe the legal status of the institution.''' <br /> <br /> Not relevant because not an institution.<br /> The Swiss Virtual Campus is a '''programme''' or an '''initiative''' encouraging projects, not an institution in the strict sense.<br /> Note, the label &quot;Swiss virtual Campus&quot; is a confusing name all the more as its structure is composed of a steering committee and a coordination office, like many other Virtual Campus institutions/initiatives/consortiums.<br /> The actors in this programme are the institutions who developed projects (cooperation of 3 institutions at minimum by project).<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(13) List the language(s) that the institution uses for instruction with the percentage of students studying in each. (Bilingual study can also be included.)'''<br /> <br /> Language officially used in SVC are:<br /> * English<br /> * French<br /> * German<br /> <br /> Results impulse programme:<br /> <br /> Languages<br /> approx. 1/10: in G F E<br /> 2/5: no translations<br /> 1/10: div. languages to E<br /> 1/10: translations only into national languages<br /> <br /> * 4 projects: all in German, French and English; 10 projects: several languages without translations.<br /> * 5 projects: parts in another language; <br /> * 5 projects: German or French or Italian, with English;<br /> * 3 projects: G F; 2 projects: G F I;<br /> * 7 projects: only E; <br /> * 2 projects: only F; <br /> * 6 projects: only G.<br /> <br /> This is the repartition of native languages in the student population:<br /> 65% German, 22% French, 7% Italian, 0.4% Rätoromanisch, 0.8% English, 5% other native language<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(14) Describe any specific cultural issues that affect the institution's students or state that that it is the same as for other institutions in the country. Mention any features relevant to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Not relevant, we are talking about a country scale initiative.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(15) Describe the external quality assurance and/or accreditation regime affecting the institution, or state that it is the same as for other institutions in the country. Mention any features relevant to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Evaluation of Teaching by the Institutions: institutional evaluation of teaching is not yet dominant.<br /> * 4 projects reported on evaluations of teaching by the institution in intervals of 3 semesters to several years.<br /> * 6 projects indicated to be supported in their student enquiries by the institutional office for the evaluation of teaching or by another support office of the institution.<br /> * 14 projects indicated to evaluate their courses every time.<br /> <br /> Standards: approx. 1/10 active users<br /> * 6 projects use e-learning standards like SCORM and / or QTI (IMS)<br /> <br /> ---<br /> <br /> In general the SVC projects made considerable efforts to assure quality. Their most important concern is the enhancement of the quality of teaching. On the one hand ponderous peer reviews assured the content quality of the material, on the other hand several forms of student feedback were used to assess acceptance in the future user groups. When applying for maintenance for the SVC Consolidation Program the results of an internal project evaluation have to be presented. The projects are therefore obliged to internal quality assurance. The projects handle this obligation in different ways:<br /> <br /> * Some projects, like 991053-SWISSLING, had very intense evaluations with internal evaluation teams, often project partners. Especially the students were intensely asked on their learning experiences, but also further aspects of teaching / learning scenarios were investigated. Nearly all projects have at least started to do such internal evaluations with their students.<br /> <br /> * Another form of internal evaluation doesn’t concern the quality of the learning processes, but<br /> of the material. Peer review processes take place in all projects in which several partners<br /> use the same material. This is not always done as systematically and supported by the<br /> computer as it is done with 991017-DOIT. These processes are mostly seen as something<br /> evident, and are not even mentioned. Peer review processes are ponderous, but they<br /> contribute a lot to the acceptance of the material by the partners. Often the professors<br /> continue to use only their own material, but they are conscious of the whole spectrum of<br /> project material, and there are first attempts to use material that has been created by other<br /> persons, sometimes also in foreign projects.<br /> <br /> * The project 200114-SUPPREM is the only one to follow another strategy. There is no peer<br /> review, referring to the academic freedom of teaching. All parts of the material are available<br /> to the partners, and there is already an interest in sharing material.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(16) Describe the approach to credit transfer with other similar institutions.'''<br /> <br /> It seems accreditation was considered since the bigining as the material, courses developed must be integrated into normal cursus.<br /> <br /> Pour terminer cette vue d’ensemble de l’état de réalisation et de mise en oeuvre des<br /> projets CVS, il nous reste à décrire l’intégration des cours de e-learning développées<br /> dans d’éventuels systèmes de points de crédit.<br /> Selon les rapports de projet analysés, les produits e-learning de vingt-quatre projets<br /> CVS sont mis en oeuvre dans le cadre d’un système de points de crédit (ECTS).<br /> Celui-ci peut se présenter sous deux formes: Soit les points ECTS récompensent le<br /> fait même que les modules ou cours de e-learning ont été traités ou suivis avec<br /> succès, le cas échéant avec en complément un examen à passer en mode<br /> présentiel; soit les modules ou séquences de e-learning sont intégrés en<br /> complément à l’enseignement présentiel, en parallèle de ce dernier, et<br /> ponctuellement à titre substitutif, dans le cadre de leçons (présentielles) dotées de<br /> points ECTS. Dans ce cas, les étudiants ne doivent pas seulement fournir la preuve<br /> qu’ils ont traité les parties de e-learning, mais doivent également attester d’autres<br /> résultats pour obtenir des points ECTS. Le reporting de projet ne permet pas de<br /> déterminer exactement la forme la plus fréquente d’attribution de points ECTS pour<br /> récompenser les produits élaborés dans le cadre du CVS. Toutefois, en ce qui<br /> concerne l’intégration de ces produits dans des systèmes de crédit, il apparaît que la<br /> possibilité est offerte aux partenaires participants d’octroyer un nombre variable de<br /> crédits à une offre d’e-learning donnée d’après l’importance et le rôle de cette<br /> dernière dans un cursus particulier.<br /> <br /> Status in 2004:<br /> ECTS Points, Certificates,Exams:<br /> Approx. 1/3: more than 8 points;<br /> Approx. 1/4: between 4 and 8 points;<br /> Detailed:<br /> 15 projects offer courses summing up for more than 8 ECTS credit points (= approx. 240 working hours of students).<br /> 12 projects: between 4 and 8 credit points; 9 projects: between 1 and 4 credit points.<br /> 9 projects are not implemented or the number of credit points is 13<br /> Approx. 1/5: between 1 and 4 points.<br /> Approx. 3/10 of all projects have changed the exams and have therefore truly obligatory online parts.<br /> still open.<br /> 2 projects belong to the category “Educational Support”; therefore they do not offer any courses for regular students.<br /> 5 projects indicated the credit points for the virtual offers separately. In 14 projects the use of the online learning environment is obligatory. The other projects do the exams as before. The use of the SVC material cannot be truly obligatory there.<br /> (Basis: 47 projects)<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(17) List the main associations that the institution is a member of, with a note as to the relevance of each to e-learning (if any).'''<br /> <br /> Not relevant.<br /> SVC is not a member of any institution as SVC is a National programme.<br /> Universities participating in SVC are probably the members of several association. This should be elaborated.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(18) List the main international partners of the institution, in the order of strategic importance, with priority given to collaborations involving e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Nothing available that can proof international partnership with other institutions.<br /> <br /> == Strategy ==<br /> <br /> (Do not include annual plans.)<br /> * '''(19) Describe or provide a document describing the current institutional strategy.'''<br /> * '''(20) Describe or provide a document describing the current learning and teaching strategy.'''<br /> * '''(21) Describe or provide a document describing the current e-learning strategy.<br /> Do not include or refer to annual plans except as necessary to provide budgetary information.'''<br /> * '''(22) What is the percentage of students (a) taking courses wholly or largely delivered by e-learning (b) taking courses where the amount of institutionally supplied/guided e-learning is &quot;significant&quot; (i.e. has an impact on staff or students) and (c) taking courses where the where the amount of institutionally supplied/guided e-learning is insignificant? In each case comment on the answer.'''<br /> <br /> While the overall goals of the programme were not modified, the second phase (consolidation<br /> phase; 2004-2007) entailed a significant change in the implementation strategy, taking also into<br /> account the goal stated in the multiyear planning of Swiss universities of the Rectorʼs<br /> Conference (CRUS) to have at least 10% of the courses supported by new educational<br /> technologies.<br /> <br /> * '''(23) Give the percentage of the institutional budget that e-learning represents. Comment on how it is measured including the assumptions made, whether it is appropriate and any trends.'''<br /> <br /> considering that SFr 37 millions of federal funds were invested in the SVC<br /> impulse programme, the actual “outputs” of the programme (in terms of<br /> e-learning products) may seem to be somewhat disappointing. However, there is<br /> no ready-to-use benchmark that would help to assess the actual cost of the<br /> development and implementation of e-learning programmes in higher education,<br /> thus making it difficult to speak precisely in terms of lack of efficiency. In addition,<br /> it seems highly probable that some of the framework conditions of the programme<br /> (notably the principle of matching funds and the requirement for inter-institutional<br /> cooperation), as well as the lack of solid e-learning experience amongst project<br /> partners have raised the costs of the different projects.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(24) Categorise the role (if any) of external funding in fostering the development of e-learning as (a) not relevant, (b) useful, or (c) essential. Comment on the choice.'''<br /> <br /> (c) essential.<br /> <br /> La participation des universités<br /> au programme est subventionnée dans le cadre des contributions destinées aux projets<br /> d’innovation et de coopération selon la loi sur l’aide aux universités (LAU). Celle<br /> des écoles polytechniques fédérales (EPF) et des hautes écoles spécialisées a été<br /> soutenue respectivement, pour cette première période, par le Conseil des EPF et<br /> l’Office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie. Les hautes écoles<br /> participant aux projets ont dû également contribuer à leur financement.<br /> <br /> == Structure ==<br /> <br /> * '''(25) Describe the institutional structure, preferably supplying an organogram.'''<br /> <br /> The organisational structure of the SVC programme has been largely the same throughout its<br /> whole life (see Figure 1). The main change from the impulse to the consolidation phase has<br /> been the transfer of operational tasks to the CRUS.<br /> <br /> [[Image:SVCorga.JPG]]<br /> <br /> While the general responsibility has been attributed to the SUC – taking the formal decisions on<br /> funding of CCSP and projects -, the implementation of the programme has been assumed by a<br /> steering committee SVC-SC, composed by ten experts in the field, including two foreign<br /> experts. The SVC-SC has been responsible for evaluating the CCSP applications, for<br /> organizing the call for new projects and the selection process, for defining mandates and<br /> support services and, finally, for organising the reporting and monitoring of the activities.<br /> The programme coordination was transferred for the consolidation phase from the SUC to the<br /> CRUS, with the aim of strengthening the link of the SVC to higher education institutions.<br /> Although the programme was launched by the SUC, UAS were integrated into it both<br /> concerning the projects and the programme organization; thus, the Federal Office of<br /> Professional Education and Technology (OPET) progressively transferred all tasks, except the<br /> contracts and payments, to the SVC coordination, which was charged also with the monitoring<br /> of CCSP in UAS, of the project selection and monitoring (including financial reporting). With this aim, the OPET financed half a position in the SVC coordination, while the SVC-SC included<br /> also UAS representatives.<br /> <br /> Participation of FIT was slightly different, since both ETHZ and EPFL developed their own support centres without direct support from the SVC programme; FIT participated in some of the projects and mandates, but their degree of involvement has been lower, especially in the consolidation phase (both institutions disposed also of their own funds for educational innovation and elearning). The FIT board has always been represented in the SVC-SC. In accordance with the Federal Council’s message, the Swiss Virtual Campus is to be run by the existing Swiss University Conference and taken over by the new SUC when it commences operations.<br /> <br /> Two bodies were set up to prepare and implement the entire Programme: the SVC Commission and the SVC Steering Committee. The creation of two supervisory bodies ensures that there is close contact with universities, which is essential for the success of the Programme, and that the proposals submitted are given an impartial assessment by recognised specialists.<br /> <br /> The main responsibilities of the institutions are as follows: <br /> <br /> * '''Swiss University Conference (SUC)'''<br /> Under the agreement between the Swiss government and the university cantons on collaboration in the university field, the SUC provides project-linked funds (Art. 6 Para. 1 Item b) and thus assumes responsibility for the Programme. It approves the Implementation Plan and appoints the members of the Steering Committee and its chair upon the proposal of the CRUS. <br /> <br /> * '''Rector's Conference of the Swiss Universities (CRUS)'''<br /> The development of online courses and their integration with university curricula are eminently academic areas. Together with the opportunity to strengthen the engagement of the rectorates at the local level through the creation of competence centres, it was deemed appropriate that the operational implementation of the SVC Programme at the national level should also come under the rectorates. This approach was approved by the CRUS, to which the operational implementation was entrusted as of 1 January 2004. The programme coordination office (administration) will be attached to the CRUS for administrative purposes, in the same way as it is now under the SUC. In addition, the CRUS ensures the link between the rectorates and the Programme, a function hitherto handled by the SVC Commission, which was wound up at the end of 2003.<br /> <br /> * '''SVC Steering Committee'''<br /> The Steering Committee is responsible for implementing the Programme. Its brief is as follows: <br /> <br /> ** to carry out the Implementation Plan for 2004-2007 <br /> ** to define the qualitative criteria for project selection <br /> ** to organize submissions for projects <br /> ** to evaluate and select drafts and project applications for universities, and propose finance plans for them <br /> ** to evaluate drafts and project applications for universities of applied sciences and forward them to the OPET <br /> ** to monitor and support projects during their development phase <br /> ** to define the mandates to support the Programme and the development of projects; it can decide to place mandates up to an amount of 50,000 francs per contract <br /> ** to submit reports <br /> ** to inform the public<br /> <br /> The Steering Committee consists of 10 members, including the chair and two foreign experts. The State Secretariat for Education and Research SER (former Federal Office for Education and Science FOES), OPET, CRUS und SUC each delegate a permanent observer. Guests may be invited to take part in meetings. <br /> <br /> The Committee may set up technical groups. It submits its financial proposals to the CRUS for the attention of the SUC. <br /> <br /> * '''Coordination of the SVC Program'''<br /> The main task of the SVC coordination office (administration) is to assist the Steering Committee in the performance of its duties and in securing the link with and between university competence centres. Its other tasks include: <br /> <br /> responsibility for all matters pertaining to programme organization <br /> drafting of qualitative and financial reports <br /> budget preparation <br /> following up mandates and projects in cooperation with the Steering Committee <br /> Event organization. <br /> <br /> * '''State Secretariat for Education and Research SER''' ( former Federal Office for Education and Science FOES)<br /> The SER is responsible for credit management, auditing and reporting, and issues guidelines for this purpose.<br /> <br /> * '''Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology (OPET)''' The OPET promotes the introduction of eLearning at the Universities of Applied Sciences. The OPET is also represented in the Steering Committee SVC.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(26) Classify the e-learning support model as (a) hub (b) distributed (c) hub and spokes (d) complicated (e) non-existent. Comment on the choice.'''<br /> * '''(27) Describe in more detail the structure for the e-learning operation and how it maps into the institutional structure.'''<br /> <br /> In the institutions where the CCSPs have found stable positions, they have been mostly<br /> integrated in the central services, as a part of the vice-rectorate for education; in a number of<br /> cases, the CCSP is strongly integrated with the support service for didactics, emphasizing the<br /> fact that it is considered as an integral part of the improvement of the educational quality. Thus,<br /> SVC Final Evaluation. Background Report Lepori and Probst<br /> 24<br /> some CCSPs make a clear link with reforms of curricula as in UNISG – where elearning has<br /> been explicitly targeted to support the self-study component – and with the introduction of<br /> Bologna; many CCSPs are directly integrated in the process of reform of curricula. A special<br /> case is southern Switzerland, where the two HEIs (USI and SUPSI) have decide to join their<br /> forces in a single support centre, while in Lucerne the university has delegated the support<br /> centre to the pedagogical school.<br /> In a number of cases, the CCSP has been decentralized inside a specific faculty or institute: this<br /> reflects the existence of a specialised service at this level (like AUM in the faculty of medicine in<br /> Bern), but also the will to have units which still keep a strong link with research on educational<br /> technologies, thus avoiding a pure function of service. This is clearly the case for UNISG, EPFL<br /> and USI-SUPSI, whose CCSPs are integrated in three institutes with a strong research function<br /> in the field, cooperating together in the new doctoral programme on new media in education<br /> funded by the Swiss National Science foundation. Other CCSPs found this link with (mostly<br /> practice-oriented) research in the field through participation in networks and organization of<br /> international events (like the conference of the Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft<br /> GMW in the German-speaking universities). Some of our respondents clearly stated that the<br /> relationship to research is critical in a fast-evolving field like educational technology: it seems<br /> that developing a well-functioning CCSP in a long-term perspective entails also a difficult<br /> balance between service activities and link to research (with their different internal logics and<br /> ways of functioning).<br /> <br /> At the organizational level, roughly speaking, we can distinguish between two different models<br /> for the establishments of a CCSP:<br /> • The model of the individual centre gathering in a single unit the competences needed for<br /> elearning: this model characterizes UZH, UNIFR, USI-SUPSI, UNILU, UNISG and, among<br /> the UAS, the HSLU. In some cases, the centre also has delegates in the departments and<br /> faculties to allow for a better integration with education.<br /> • The network model where the CCSP is composed by the coordination of different units, for<br /> example a didactical centre and the informatics services; this model characterizes UNIGE,<br /> UNIBAS and UNIL and most of the UAS. This models answers better to the needs of<br /> decentralised institutions like UAS or where different centres existed already before the<br /> establishment of the CCSP.<br /> The interviews showed that both models can function well and, at the end, it is left to individual<br /> institutions to find a solution which suits their situation best, even if one has to recognize that<br /> network structures are to some extent more difficult to manage. A further concern is about the size of the centres since for some institutions it might be that a critical mass for offering different<br /> services and ensuring continuity (for example if the CCSP leader leaves) is not attained. From<br /> this perspective, our opinion is that some of the small and more decentralised structures are still<br /> rather fragile and depend on the person of the coordination itself and thus consolidation will be<br /> required in the next years.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(28) Describe the committees that oversee e-learning (including the rank and role of the Chair in each relevant committee) and their relationship to the organisational structure.'''<br /> <br /> == Learning and Teaching processes ==<br /> <br /> This has a focus on learning and teaching with other aspects viewed from this perspective.<br /> <br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching design and delivery ===<br /> <br /> * '''(29) Describe how choice of pedagogies and technologies is made for a typical programme that is envisaged to include significant e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Pedagogical Consulting and Support<br /> approx. 1/5: individually organised pedagogical support<br /> <br /> At least 15 projects had a pedagogue as a partner or as a team member. At least 4 projects engaged external experts (e.g. independent consultants) for external evaluation and consulting.<br /> Many projects mentioned the support centres of the institutions. 8 projects mentioned explicitely to have had positive experiences with IntersTICES, 11 projects with eQuality.<br /> <br /> * '''(30) Describe what scope staff have at delivery stage to refine or in some cases override design decisions made earlier.'''<br /> <br /> Design Rules for the Material<br /> approx. 1/5 had a clearly defined concept<br /> <br /> 15 projects indicated to have developed exact guidelines for the<br /> design of the material. For 3 projects this wasn’t relevant because<br /> design was done independently by one single person.<br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching development ===<br /> <br /> <br /> This includes materials and IPR.<br /> <br /> * '''(31) How much e-learning content is sourced from outside the institution? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment (an exact percentage is useful).'''<br /> <br /> The new forms of cooperation are manifold. Very rare up to now is the sharing of courses, of<br /> students and of teaching material. First the teaching material has to be developed and finished<br /> solidly. Up to now the effort of finishing the development of content material despite delays and exaggerated plans has rather slowed down further cooperation initiatives that would presuppose such material.<br /> <br /> Many plans for cooperation fail because of the orientation of the material in the content details. Something that seems to fit may well go too much into detail and be too specialised at a closer look. Usually the material is not yet structured systematically into a general and a specialised part in order to make parts of it usable in other contexts. There is still the problem of examples, anyway. They reach their aim only if they are likely to rise interest and to convince. Unusual examples from foreign domains can restrain the learning success.<br /> <br /> Fostering the sharing of online material is tightly linked with technical, legal, pedagogical, social and psychological questions; it is a complex domain.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(32) Of all e-learning content sourced from outside the institution, what fraction is OER? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(33) When staff in the institution develop content, is the content (a) owned by them and licensed to the institution, (b) owned by the institution but with some licensing back to staff, (c) owned by the institution but with no licensing back to staff, (d) unclear or disputed IPR position? Whatever option is chosen, provide a narrative describing the situation in more detail.'''<br /> <br /> Most projects have plans for further cooperations, but no new users yet. Sharing fails for instance because a project has received the right to use a software free of charge, and it would cost for the new partner. Or because copyright questions aren’t clarified enough to take the risk to let a larger target public use the material; they fear lawsuits. Or because they don’t trust the quality of their own material and want to make further reviews.<br /> <br /> * '''(34) When content is sourced for a programme within the institution, how much is sourced from other departments within the institution? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment (an exact percentage is useful).'''<br /> <br /> * '''(35) What is the role of student-generated content in the institution's programmes? Use a scale of 1-5 with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> === Learning and teaching evaluation and quality ===<br /> <br /> * '''(36) Describe the quality procedures (a) in general terms and (b) with respect to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> Student Questionnaires regularly in regular courses.<br /> All projects did at least tests with single students. 35 projects indicated to have done student enquiries in regular courses.<br /> <br /> * '''(37) Describe the approach to evaluation of programmes (a) in general terms and (b) where such programmes have significant e-learning components.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> * Evaluation of the impulse programme (2000-2003)<br /> <br /> Au début du mois de janvier 2003, la Conférence Universitaire Suisse (CUS) a donné<br /> mandat au Centre de formation continue de l’Université de Berne (KWB) d’évaluer le<br /> programme d’impulsion „Campus Virtuel Suisse“ (CVS). Pour l’exécution de ce<br /> mandat, le KWB a travaillé en coopération avec l’Observatoire Science, Politique et<br /> Société (OSPS) de l’EPF de Lausanne, tout en assumant la responsabilité du projet.<br /> <br /> <br /> A set of questions were used to structure the evaluation which took place over a<br /> period of sixteen months:<br /> <br /> • What are the visions, the goals and objectives of the SVC programme according to<br /> its principal stakeholders? What are its expected effects and impacts?<br /> <br /> • How do different stakeholders assess the relevance and coherence of the<br /> programme? How well do the objectives of the SVC reflect the structural and<br /> strategic needs and interests of the institutions concerned?<br /> <br /> • What promotion strategies were adopted? What kind of projects were promoted?<br /> <br /> • How are the implementation and management of the programme to be judged?<br /> What procedures and rules governed the realisation processes of the SVC and its<br /> projects? How well did they function?<br /> <br /> • What are the most significant results, effects and impacts of the SVC programme?<br /> How well has the SVC programme met its objectives?<br /> <br /> • How are SVC project results used? How well are they integrated in the curricula of<br /> participating institutions?<br /> <br /> <br /> To address these evaluation questions the following methods and procedures have<br /> been applied:<br /> <br /> • Analysis of SVC documents and online materials, as for example, SVC<br /> execution plan, calls for proposals series 1 and 2, project proposals, project<br /> reports, reports on e-site visits, websites of SVC and its projects etc.;<br /> <br /> • Semi-structured interviews with 48 key persons and stakeholders of SVC<br /> (members of the SVC Steering Committee, the SVC Commission, representatives<br /> of the SUC, the federal offices concerned and of participating institutions);<br /> <br /> • E-mail questionnaire to project leaders and coordinators (response rate: 50%);<br /> <br /> • Review of the 2003 project reporting (24 intermediary and 13 final reports);<br /> <br /> • Review of the 15 project submissions for maintenance support.<br /> <br /> Consolidation programme:<br /> <br /> Evaluation of SVC is being carried out by Professor [[Robin Mason]] of the UK [[Open University]]. This phase starts with a meeting in April 2008 and continues with interviews of key officials and stakeholders in June 2008. An evaluation report is available and have information of interest:<br /> <br /> == Meta Learning and Teaching processes ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Communications ===<br /> <br /> * '''(38) Describe how the institution communicates good practice in e-learning within itself, focussing on communications across internal boundaries.'''<br /> * ('''39) Describe how the institution communicates its good practice in e-learning to organisations outside.'''<br /> <br /> Cette démarche s’inscrit dans la politique de dissémination poursuivie par le CVS tout au<br /> long des années 2004-2008. Il s’agit ainsi d’offrir à l’ensemble des produits et services<br /> eLearning une plateforme supplémentaire d’échanges et d’informations leur permettant<br /> de se faire connaître au sein de la communauté eLearning suisse et au-delà et de donner<br /> lieu dans un second temps à d’éventuelles collaborations.<br /> <br /> * &quot;Campus Virtuel Suisse Phase de consolidation – 2004-2008 CCSP, projets et mandats Tour d’horizon&quot;. L’objectif de la brochure est de présenter l’ensemble des produits et services qui ont été développés au cours de la phase de consolidation du programme fédéral du Campus Virtuel Suisse (CVS).<br /> * Elle fait suite à la première publication du CVS intitulée « Les premiers 50 projets – 2000-<br /> 2003 »1.<br /> <br /> Les deux brochures permettant alors de couvrir l’ensemble de la période du CVS.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(40) Describe how the institution communicates good practice in e-learning from outside organisations into its own organisation.'''<br /> * '''(41) Describe recent occasions on which institutional leaders or managers have made presentations with significant reference to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> === Value for money ===<br /> <br /> * '''(42) Describe the annual planning procedure (a) in general and (b) how it handles e-learning aspects.'''<br /> * '''(43) Describe the decision-making process for a typical academic programme, with particular reference to how e-learning aspects are handled.'''<br /> * '''(44) Describe the decision-making process for a typical large IT project such as selection and installation of a new VLE.'''<br /> * '''(45) Describe the approach to budget management with particular reference to the staff versus non-staff issues in budgeting for e-learning.'''<br /> * '''(46) Describe the procedures in the institution for assigning or negotiating teaching workload to/with staff, taking account of non-traditional styles of teaching as well as classroom teaching and taking specific account of e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Staff ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Teachers, lecturers, trainers and equivalent support roles ===<br /> <br /> * '''(47) Describe the approach to development of e-learning technical and pedagogic skills among staff, taking account of the different needs of different categories of staff. Set this within the context of staff development generally.'''<br /> <br /> Technical consulting and support more than 1/2 individual<br /> * 8 projects indicated Edutech as an important consultant and support. 9 projects referred to support structures of their institution.<br /> * 7 projects didn’t need technical support because of their own competencies. <br /> * 11 projects indicated to have profited from the SVC mandate Edutech (http://www.edutech.ch).<br /> <br /> * '''(48) Describe (a) the current level of staff competence in e-learning and (b) the expected level of staff competence in five years time. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(49) Describe the extent to which staff attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(50) Describe the way that the institution rewards and recognises staff with competence in e-learning, in (a) monetary and (b) non-monetary terms.'''<br /> <br /> === Management and leadership ===<br /> <br /> This subsection concerns leaders (Rectors, Vice-Chancellors, etc) and academic and support service managers (Deans, Directors, etc). These do not need to have specific knowledge of e-learning details but must have the necessary strategic, management, costing and foresight capability to preside over decisions on key e-learning issues such as procurement of a new VLE, development of a new distance learning programme, rebalancing the library and its staff more towards web 2.0 and less to books, etc. This will require appropriate manager and leader training.<br /> * '''(51) Describe the approach to development of e-learning-related skills among (a) managers and (b) leaders.'''<br /> * '''(52) Describe the current level of (a) management and (b) leadership competence in e-learning related skills appropriate to their levels. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(53) describe the extent to which (a) management and (b) leadership attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> * '''(54) Give details of the job description of the most senior manager/leader in the organisation who spends a significant portion of his/her time on e-learning matters (e.g. the Director of E-Learning).'''<br /> <br /> == Students ==<br /> <br /> Contributions to the Project from Students:<br /> 10 projects have integrated contributions from students into project material.<br /> <br /> * '''(55) Describe the approach to development of e-learning skills among students, taking account of the different needs of different categories of students. Set this within the context of students' more general information literacy and communication skills.'''<br /> <br /> ** 72 % understand quickly how to learn with the virtual learning offering.<br /> ** 26% rate the item negatively or are undecided.<br /> <br /> ** 63% of the students estimate that their learning processes are supported by the virtual learning offering. <br /> ** 36 % rate the item negatively or are undecided.<br /> <br /> * '''(56) Describe (a) the current level of student competence in e-learning on entry to the institution and (b) the expected level of student competence on graduation from the institution. In each case use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> A line is writen in the report for this purpose. But the matching information cell is empty. ???<br /> <br /> * '''(57) Describe the extent to which student attitudes to e-learning are favourable or not. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> The small number of statements on learning with virtual learning offerings could mean that students are open and do accept the implementation of eLearning.<br /> <br /> * '''(58) Describe the extent to which students understand the demands on them placed by e-learning systems (e.g. for assignment handling).'''<br /> <br /> 72% consider the learning goals to be stated clearly. 18% are indecisive or consider the learning goals as unclear.<br /> <br /> * '''(59) Describe the current approach to handling student plagiarism, both prevention strategies and detection strategies.'''<br /> * '''(60) Describe the current (i.e. at last survey) level of student satisfaction with the e-learning aspects of their courses. Use a 1-5 scale with a comment.'''<br /> <br /> 60% consider the learning offering as appropriate to achieve the declared learning goals. 35% are undecided or disagree.<br /> <br /> == Technology ==<br /> <br /> '''(61) For each of the following technologies relevant to e-learning describe how much it is used on a scale of 1-5 and add a comment if appropriate.'''<br /> <br /> [[Edutech]] was in charge to provide support to SVC with technological matters.<br /> <br /> <br /> * VLE and/or content repository<br /> <br /> Plate-forme nationale (WebCT Vista) auprès de SWITCH: Comme une bonne<br /> partie des projets CVS est destinée au WebCT, une plate-forme nationale WebCT<br /> Vista a été créée auprès de SWITCH sur mandat du CVS. Celle-ci compte mille<br /> „seats“ dans un premier temps, disponibles pour les projets CVS correspondants.<br /> En fonction des résultats de cette première plate-forme, une sera, possiblement,<br /> ouverte.<br /> <br /> * email or bulletin boards<br /> ** Course e-Mail<br /> ** Discussion-Forum<br /> * automated assessment<br /> * Web 2.0 tools especially blogs, wikis and social networks oriented to the institution<br /> ** textbooks<br /> ** Collaboration : 12% use the virtual offerings for collaboration and 15% only partly<br /> * e-portfolios<br /> * laptops - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> * audio or video podcasting or streaming - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> * mobile devices (not laptops) - and comment on student ownership issues<br /> And finally:<br /> * Provide a description of any other technologies with significant use in the institution.<br /> <br /> ** Flash Notes: Flash Support for SVC Projects<br /> ** 19 projects have developed software.<br /> <br /> == Futures ==<br /> <br /> A la demande du président du Comité de pilotage du Campus Virtuel Suisse (CVS), nous vous transmettons quelques informations sur la situation et l'état actuel de la négotiation concernant la réalisation d'un &quot;service national de plateforme&quot;:<br /> <br /> Le Comité de pilotage du CVS a soumis à la Conférence Générale (Conférence des Recteurs des Universités Suisses CRUS, Conférence Suisse des Hautes Écoles Spécialisées CSHES, Conférence Suisse des Recteurs des Hautes Écoles Pédagogiques CSHEP) la proposition qu'un service national de plateforme soit offert par SWITCH à partir de janvier 2008. Il est prévu que la plateforme WebCT Vista et une plateforme en logiciel libre soient hébergées. Une répartition du financement entre des contributions fédérales fixes et des frais d' exploitation variables en fonction du nombre d'utilisateurs doit permettre une utilisation peu onéreuse de l'offre. <br /> La CRUS, la CSHES et la CSHEP plaident pour la mise en place d'un service national de plateforme à partir de 2007 et recommandent à SWITCH de négocier avec le Comité de Pilotage du CVS pour réaliser l'hébergement et l'opérationnalisation des plateformes correspondantes. <br /> Le Comité de pilotage du CVS dispose de licences auprès de WebCT Vista jusqu'à la fin 2007 et négocie pour le moment avec SWITCH pour l'acquisition de licences à vie. <br /> Les négociations doivent être conclues entre WebCT, SWITCH et le Secrétariat d’Etat à l'éducation et à la recherche SER. La Conférence universitaire suisse CUS doit approuver formellement la décision. Nous espérons qu'une décision sera encore possible cette année. <br /> La fusion de WebCT et de Blackboard a peu d'influence sur le service de plateforme à court et à moyen terme. A long terme, une modification concernant les produits software est possible.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(62) Describe the expected changes as they relate to e-learning within the institution's current strategic horizon (from the institution's strategy documents).'''<br /> * '''(63) Describe any changes further downstream that the institution is now considering or concerned about.'''<br /> * '''(64) Describe how the institution handles the foresight aspects of its operation with regard to e-learning.'''<br /> <br /> '''After the Swiss Virtual Campus'''<br /> <br /> Already at the beginning of the consolidation phase it had been determined that the costs for funding eLearning projects should gradually be integrated into the normal budgets at the institutes for higher education. The Rectors’ Conference of the Swiss Universities (CRUS) confirmed this plan in September 2007 and emphasised that in the future the development of eLearning as an inherent component of teaching would lie in the sole responsibility of the institutes for higher education.<br /> With this in mind, all stakeholders have prepared for the transition and the handing over of projects to the two major stakeholders: the centres of competence, service and production (CCSPs) and the foundation SWITCH, both of which will offer a package of central services for the teaching staff after the SVC phase.<br /> <br /> '''CCSPs'''<br /> The centres of competence, service and production (CCSPs) at the various institutes of<br /> higher education have been implemented or strengthened in the SVC’s consolidation<br /> phase and will essentially continue to function in the post-SVC phase and promote the<br /> development and the use of educational technology. Although the size and organisational<br /> structure of the CCSPs may vary among the different institutes of higher education,<br /> the services they offer can be classified into two major categories: support in didactic or<br /> technical questions as regards implementing eLearning tools, and support for the executive<br /> boards at the institutes of higher education regarding the strategic integration of<br /> new educational technology to improve the quality of academic teaching.<br /> <br /> '''SWITCH'''<br /> SWITCH has always been a preferred contact of the SVC. Particularly within the framework<br /> of the mandates assigned by the steering committee of the SVC, SWITCH has developed a<br /> broad range of services for the eLearning community. Over the course of time, this collaboration<br /> has evolved into the «eduhub»8 concept, first initiated by the SVC and consequently<br /> elaborated and implemented by SWITCH. This concept enables SWITCH to regularly offer<br /> the Swiss eLearning community an entire package of activities and central services9.<br /> One of the more important activities was setting up the «Educational Technology Working<br /> Group» which provides a platform for various representatives of the CCSPs and the<br /> stakeholders who are responsible for new educational technology at the institutes of<br /> higher education. The working group aims to promote educational technology in academic<br /> education in Switzerland by cooperating mainly on a national level. Other goals<br /> include political lobbying and international networking.<br /> <br /> '''Teaching staff'''<br /> However, beyond establishing the central services that are now available, it is obvious that<br /> the success of eLearning in the post-SVC phase and in the coming years will also depend<br /> on teachers and lecturers, their enthusiasm and commitment, and their conviction of the<br /> benefit of new educational technology.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(65) Describe how the institution handles advanced development oriented to e-learning (e.g. by a &quot;sandbox&quot; lab, innovation centre, etc).'''<br /> * '''(66) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account present and future markets for its offerings.'''<br /> <br /> A big challenge for the next few years will be to use, maintain and disseminate these results without direct federal funding within ordinary teaching assignments and supported by the existing service units within institutions of higher education (IHE). The use of existing material for further users should be profitable for the projects.<br /> <br /> <br /> * '''(67) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account present and future competitor suppliers for its offerings.'''<br /> * '''(68) Describe how the institution analyses and takes into account the views of other stakeholders, including but not restricted to employers, local authorities and the social partners (unions).'''<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!-- Finally have a section for References etc--&gt;<br /> <br /> == References and reports ==<br /> <br /> ''Add what you can''.<br /> <br /> '''Impluse phase:'''<br /> <br /> * Evaluation report of the impulse programme (2000-2003)<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/evaluation/Impulsprogramm_fr_total.pdf (French version with summary in English)<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/evaluation/Impulsprogramm_dt_total.pdf (German version)<br /> <br /> * Documentation &quot;The Swiss Virtual Campus and the Swiss Universities&quot; for the pavillon at the exposition Learntec 2003 <br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_E.pdf (English version)<br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_D.pdf (German version)<br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/brochures/Learntec_03_F.pdf (French version)<br /> <br /> <br /> '''Consolidation phase:'''<br /> <br /> * Execution plan 2004 – 2007 - French version<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/svc_cp/Execution_Plan_f.pdf<br /> <br /> * Execution plan 2004 - 2007 - German version<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/svc_cp/Execution_Plan_d.pdf<br /> <br /> Swiss Virtual Campus - Consolidation Phase – 2004-2008 - CCSPs, projects and mandates Overview<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-En.pdf (English version)<br /> <br /> Campus Virtuel Suisse - 2004-2008 - CCSP, projets et mandats - Tour d'horizon <br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-Fr.pdf (French version)<br /> <br /> Konsolidierungsphase - 2004-2008 - CCSP, Projekte und Mandate - Überblick<br /> <br /> http://www.swissvirtualcampus.ch/docs/SVC-Brochure-De.pdf (German version)<br /> <br /> Swiss Virtual Campus Status Report 2004 Consolidated Results of the Mandate “SVC Status Reports and Project Monitoring” concerning the Projects of the Impulse Program 2000−2003<br /> <br /> http://www.virtualcampus.ch/docs/mandates/SVC%20Mandate%20Status%20Reports.pdf<br /> <br /> * Evaluation Campus Virtuel Suisse - Programme de consolidation (en Français, Allemand et Anglais)<br /> <br /> http://www.cus.ch/wDeutsch/publikationen/SVC/SVC-Evaluationsbericht-2004-07-online.pdf<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> [[SVC- Lessons learned - impulse programme]]<br /> <br /> [[SVC- Lessons learned - consolidation programme]]<br /> <br /> <br /> [[Swiss Virtual Campus - Case study (F)]]<br /> [[Swiss Virtual Campus - Case study (D)]]<br /> <br /> ----<br /> &gt; [[Switzerland]]<br /> &lt;br&gt;<br /> &gt; [[Programmes]]<br /> <br /> &gt;&gt; '''[[Case studies]]'''<br /> <br /> [[Category:Switzerland]]<br /> [[Category:Case studies]]<br /> [[Category:Case study for ULP]]</div>

DroneLtvid